Months of following the rules – and now a raft of petty new measures

SIR – First we were told that the purpose of the draconian lockdown was to save the NHS from being overwhelmed by coronavirus. The NHS was not overwhelmed.

Then we were told that the lockdown had to continue in order to flatten the curve. The curve flattened and declined.

Now, however, are being told that many of the pettifogging restrictions must continue, and we may have to revert to full measures in order to prevent a second spike in cases. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me three times, shame on me.

SIR – Was anyone surprised to see large crowds jostling on the beach at Bournemouth and elsewhere? Surely politicians could see this coming.

With a third of the working population bored on furlough, the teaching unions stopping parents sending children to school and the arrival of the hottest days of the year, people were bound to go to the seaside. Why weren’t preparations made?

Richard Fothergill

Windermere, Cumbria

SIR – I can understand those flocking to enjoy our beaches. When depressed I always head for the sea. There is also the feeling that this is the new normal, so we might as well get on with life.

However, the current situation is not the new normal: it is a holding position until a vaccine is developed and administered. Hopefully that point is not a long way off.

If everybody appreciated this, with the help of clear guidance by the Government, they might think twice before behaving so irresponsibly.

Christopher Lambert

Tadworth, Surrey

SIR – I am shielding, and have followed the Government’s advice to the letter.

My only wish is to be able to spend time with my grandchildren on August 1, to celebrate my grandson’s second birthday. I despair of my chances when I see the selfish behaviour of people on beaches, as well as those throwing parties and flouting social distancing.

I feel betrayed by my fellow citizens.

Margaret Gash

Newmarket, Suffolk

SIR – It is high time the Government realised that there is a huge difference between indoor pools and lidos.

Indoor pools may well be hothouses for germs, and changing rooms are often cramped. Lidos pose fewer risks. Swim England has suggested some restrictions to ensure that there are not too many on site or in the water at once.

Swimming is beneficial to physical and mental health, and a good way to take outdoor exercise. Instead of jumping into reservoirs and canals – and overcrowding beaches – people need to be given the option of swimming in Britain’s wonderful lidos.

Fiona Wild

Cheltenham, Gloucestershire