The Sunday Telegraph

Sussexes say unnamed ‘sources’ will no longer speak for them

- By Hannah Furness

UNNAMED “sources” will no longer speak for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in the media, their team have said.

The Sussexes’ communicat­ions team at Archewell will speak on the record or not at all, as fans of the couple are warned to pay no heed to mystery “sources” claiming to talk for them in the press.

It follows the couple’s campaign against sections of the media, which the Duchess has criticised as a “model that rewards chaos above truth”.

The Duke, who has a job at the Aspen Institute’s Commission on Informatio­n Disorder, has similarly condemned the “avalanche of misinforma­tion” to be found online. The move is aimed at making clear when stories are true, confirmed by a spokespers­on, and when they are not authorised by Team Sussex.

It will require a marked difference in reporting, particular­ly in the US where flattering comments about celebritie­s from unnamed sources are common in even upmarket showbiz magazines.

Anonymous “friends” have long spoken about the couple, with some genuine associates doing so in an effort to protect the Duchess against what they considered unfair coverage. Her recent court case against the Mail on Sunday arose from a handwritte­n letter to her father first revealed by anonymous friends in People magazine in the US.

In the article five friends were described as telling “the truth” about the Duchess in February 2019, after a series of articles alleging she had behaved badly while at the palace.

“Forget the fact of who she’s married to – she was royalty from the day I met her,” said one.

“The way she carries herself, interacts with people, is how you would expect an actual ual royal to behave. She personifie­s elegance, legance, grace, philanthro­py.” Another said: “She can make ake a fivestar meal out of the garbage in your y refrigerat­or,”

In some cases, ses, it is suspected, unnamed sources represent little more than madeup quotes. However, some anonymous sources have provided briefings which have turned out to be an accurate reflection of what the Duke and Duchess think. Earlier this year, the Court of Appeal heard details of an email sent by the Duchess to her then communicat­ions secretary Jason Knauf, in which she provided a memo ahead of him speaking to her biographer­s.

It read, in part: “The Queen offered Windsor which the couple gratefully accepted. They are also very happy to have the space and privacy that Windsor affords.”

Sussexes used to be represente­d by their own press secretary at Buckingham Palace and before that Kensington Palace, before leaving the working family for a new life in California.

They now employ a team to run their nonprofit foundation Archewell, including James Holt, its executive director, Toya Holness, global press secretary, and Christine Schirmer as head of communicat­ions.

 ?? Ources l i t tle ow- ?? The Duke and Duchess have criticised the press
Ources l i t tle ow- The Duke and Duchess have criticised the press

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom