The Sunday Telegraph

Seven signs of an over-regulating state

For all its good intentions, this administra­tion has done little to cut red tape – quite the opposite in fact

- SAM DUMITRIU

Post-independen­ce India became notorious for the thicket of permits and licences a business needed to do virtually anything. This “Licence Raj” became a major obstacle to economic developmen­t and one reason India lagged behind other Asian countries. No individual regulation seemed especially costly or irrational, but together they made it almost impossible to start or build a business. It took the reforming government­s of the 1990s to change things.

On paper, ours is a deregulati­ng Government. It is led by people who campaigned to leave the EU because of its tendency to micromanag­e. It makes the right noises – setting up a regulatory reform taskforce; calling for red-tape slashing ideas; promising a deregulato­ry “Great Recovery” bill – but Britain is quietly developing a Licence Raj of its own. Here are seven examples.

One: restrictio­ns on foods. Under absurd new rules on foods high in fat, salt, and sugar, it will be illegal to advertise breakfast cereals before 9pm – presumably to prevent young minds being corrupted by Tony the Tiger. Supermarke­ts will be banned from offering buy-one-get-one-free deals on everything from pizza and crisps to chocolate and fish fingers. Restaurant­s such as Nando’s will be banned from offering unlimited cola refills.

The rules don’t just determine what shops can advertise or offer. They even decide which shelves can be used. Shop-fronts are strictly off limits, as are the ends of aisles and anywhere near checkouts (there are no exemptions for shops with multiple entrances either). Instead of focusing on fixing supplychai­ns, supermarke­ts will now spend months trying to game the new rules.

Two: the requiremen­t that – in the midst of a housing crisis – all new builds must provide a net gain in biodiversi­ty. As one planning expert explained it to me: “If you’re building homes in urban centres, it’s a pain. You impact biodiversi­ty, but then lack the land to fix the problem.”

Three: “bee bricks”. In Brighton and Hove, where house prices have risen rapidly, the council now requires all new homes to be built with a bee brick, designed to provide a safe nesting site for the insects. A biologist friend can find no evidence of a shortage of accommodat­ion for bees. If only the same were true of people.

Four: the new protect duty. Announced last week, all public venues will soon have a legal duty to be prepared for a terrorist attack. Staff will need to be trained about likely attack methods and to spot “hostile reconnaiss­ance”. This will apply to any venue with a capacity of more than 100, not just stadiums and arenas.

Five: every business with more than £36million annual turnover must publish an annual modern slavery statement. The Government itself concedes that many companies see it as a tick-box exercise.

Six: gender pay gap reporting. Any business employing more than 250 people must publish an annual report, yet statistici­ans warn that the data can be misused in so many ways that it will struggle to drive meaningful positive change. There are now calls to expand reporting to ethnic pay gaps, despite even more serious practical objections from statistici­ans.

Seven: net zero transition plans. From next year, all financial institutio­ns and publicly-listed firms will have to publish these. We are yet to learn the precise details, but it is likely that businesses will have to set out their emissions and how they propose to address them. Although the rules only apply to large businesses, they will likely create knock-on bureaucrac­y as they assess all their supply chains.

Despite good intentions, on Boris’s watch the regulatory burden has grown substantia­lly. Many new rules were initiated under Theresa May – who didn’t get economics or care about growth – but this administra­tion has done little to hold back the tide. As inflation bites and incomes are squeezed, the Government can no longer afford to be complacent.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom