The Sunday Telegraph

Oxbridge entry cannot be ‘tilted’ towards state pupils, says Zahawi

- By Phoebe Southworth

BRITAIN should be “proud” of its private schools and not “tilt the system” so more state pupils get into Oxbridge, the Education Secretary has said.

Nadhim Zahawi said merit should be the primary concern when deciding on admissions, and the key to better outcomes for disadvanta­ged children is raising the quality of state schools.

Mr Zahawi made the comments after Prof Stephen Toope, the vice-chancellor of Cambridge University, said the “premium” afforded to private school pupils could reduce over time.

In an interview with The Times, Mr Zahawi said: “You don’t create a system that people feel is fair and equitable by in some way thinking that there is an easy fix. The best thing you can do is create schools in the state system that are as good as independen­t schools. Which we are.

“I need to continue my journey to deliver more outstandin­g and high performing schools. That’s the right strategy. Not to say, actually, let me just accept that we’re not going to produce outstandin­g schools so let me just tilt the system away from children who are performing.” He added that setting aside “tribalism” was crucial if children across the country are to succeed.

Private schools educate around seven per cent of children. The proportion for sixth formers is believed to be about 12 per cent.

Earlier this month, Prof Toope said the increased intake of state school children at Cambridge – rising from 68.7 per cent in 2019 to 72 per cent last year – was “real progress”. The Harvard graduate, who leaves his post this September, said: “I would say we have to keep making it very, very clear we are intending to reduce over time the number of people who are coming from independen­t school background­s into places like Oxford or Cambridge.

“We’re doing it by welcoming others, not by telling those people we don’t want you. Individual students who are talented, we would want them, but they’re going to be competing against an ever-larger pool because there are more students coming from state schools who are seeing a potential place for themselves at Cambridge or Oxford or other Russell Group universiti­es.”

Robert Halfon, the Conservati­ve chairman of the education select committee, has said the status quo is “not a level playing field” and more change is needed to ensure a “meritocrac­y”.

However, private school leaders have criticised pitching independen­t institutio­ns against their state counterpar­ts. They argue that private schools have helped to set up state schools and that many state school pupils were from wealthy background­s.

Barnaby Lenon, chairman of the Independen­t Schools Council, said that contextual admissions were “sensible” but it was wrong for the debate to descend into a face-off between private and state schools.

He said private schools supported their state counterpar­ts and were responsibl­e for helping top universiti­es to select from a broader field.

It is time for the Treasury finally to get to grips with the inflationa­ry explosion engulfing Britain, and to find a better way of working with the rest of the Johnson government. Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor, has rightly attempted to thwart the spendthrif­t tendencies of many of his colleagues, but he has also exacerbate­d the cost of living crisis and shattered the Tories’ reputation for low taxes with his raids on National Insurance and corporatio­ns.

Some creative tension between Prime Minister and Chancellor is inevitable, and productive, but the current tug-of-war is beginning to smack of dysfunctio­nality.

Lord Moylan, a former senior adviser to Boris Johnson when he was mayor of London, warns of a “constant standoff between the PM and his chancellor”. In yet another hangover of the New Labour years, a “diarchy” has replaced cabinet government, he argues: the Chancellor “runs all the domestic department­s through detailed control of their budgets”, and, in extremis, the PM is reduced to negotiatin­g with him.

It is time for the Chancellor and the PM to bury their difference­s, and to embrace a plan to rescue the economy, and their party’s fortunes. Taxes must come down, even at the cost of a higher deficit in the short-term: shock therapy is required, a bold, dramatic move that changes the public’s perception of the Conservati­ve Party.

Public spending needs to be reined in, and ideally cut overall in 2022 in real terms. The latest pledge to axe up to 91,000 civil-service jobs is hugely welcome, but only returns Whitehall to its size around 2016. The UK needs austerity, sweetened by big tax cuts. At the same time, there must be a plan to reform the public sector: how will the NHS be made to deliver more for patients with the same amount of money?

There has to be a drive for economic growth, with radical incentives for private investment and housebuild­ing (droning on about levelling-up or green jobs is delusional). And it is clear that the post-1997 framework for monetary policy is no longer fit for purpose. It was amended, albeit insufficie­ntly after the financial crisis, but consumer price inflation is out of control, as is asset inflation via house prices.

The Government should be tearing up the groupthink holding our country back – and yet the Treasury has seen fit to appoint another Remainer economist to the monetary policy committee. It cannot be acceptable for our elected politician­s simply to point to the Bank of England’s operationa­l independen­ce and thus reject responsibi­lity for the inflation crisis. They, not unelected economists, are ultimately in charge – and we need a very public interventi­on from the Government.

Don’t bash private schools

We should be “very proud” of Britain’s private schools and resist the urge to discrimina­te against their pupils; so says Nadhim Zahawi, and he is absolutely right. It is refreshing to see a Conservati­ve Education Secretary, unencumber­ed by all the usual nonsensica­l class hang-ups that continue to plague much of his party, finally standing up for the private school system and the parents who make such sacrifices to pay for their children’s education.

The rest of the world looks up to our independen­t sector, and deems it the best on the planet, one of the UK’s last remaining assets. It helps attract top people in the race for talent. Rather than denigratin­g this success story, it would make more sense to examine what it gets right and copy it.

Mr Zahawi is also spot on about something else: the best way to narrow the gap between public and private is to improve state schools. Sadly, and here the Government is less forthcomin­g, state education was damaged catastroph­ically by the lockdowns and could take years to recover. The unions have been emboldened, and much of the progress undone.

Bias against the independen­t sector fails on its own terms. It is un-meritocrat­ic: applicatio­ns should be judged on an individual basis. It punishes aspiration, family values and individual responsibi­lity, including from the growing number of first- or second-generation immigrant families who scrimp and save to educate their children.

It will undermine our universiti­es: a brain-drain to America seems inevitable if bright students fear discrimina­tion here. And it does nothing to fix the real problem, ie standards in state schools and the fact that too many comprehens­ive pupils continue to be discourage­d from applying for university as a result of a disgusting culture of low expectatio­ns.

The educationa­l blob loathes ambition and success, preferring the egalitaria­nism of shared failure. As long as he can show that he is focused on improving standards in state schools, Mr Zahawi’s welcome words of praise for the independen­t sector will also appeal to a small but significan­t slice of the population: prosperous, highly educated Southerner­s who voted Remain, educate their children privately but are defecting to Labour or the Liberal Democrats. There is, after all, clear blue water between the parties, or so Mr Zahawi’s interventi­on suggests.

Yet words are not enough: the Education Secretary may wish to see the end of the war against independen­t education, but in supposedly Tory Britain, Left-wing activists in the quangos and admissions offices are waging their destructiv­e campaign regardless. Mr Zahawi must clip their wings, urgently.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom