The Sunday Telegraph

Why you can’t always trust your thoughts – or a book’s cover

- By Tim Smith-Laing BRAINWASHE­D: A NEW HISTORY OF THOUGHT CONTROL by Daniel Pick

★★★

T368pp, Wellcome, £20, ebook £11.59 he odds are that you feel at least vaguely in charge of your own brain and the beliefs it contains. That is, after all, one of the conditions of selfhood: some sort of barrier between what goes on inside your head and what goes on outside it. The barrier is porous, because it has to be. We absorb informatio­n, interact with others, process and decide; and along the way we both receive and construct the beliefs and desires that define us. We do not have total control, of course, but we have some. Most people do not go through their lives as passive receivers, believing all that they are told. Or, as historian and psychoanal­yst Daniel Pick asks in this New History of Thought Control, do we?

This is potentiall­y thoughtpro­voking stuff. Which makes it a slight shame that the first thought Brainwashe­d will provoke in many readers is, “Why is this not the book I was sold?” Despite its title, Cold-Warfocused blurb, and retro-tech tapemachin­e cover, Brainwashe­d is not a history of brainwashi­ng in the commonly understood sense of the term; and it contains little about the history of superpower attempts to implant ideas and reshape minds à la

or The

Ipcress File. Though, as other historians of the topic have done, Pick traces brainwashi­ng’s origins to the anti-Communist propagandi­st Edward Hunter (who coined it in the 1950s from the literal meaning of the Chinese characters “xi nao”), he swiftly moves on to broader ideas about groupthink and conformity. Readers really interested in the Cold War will be better served by skipping straight to Stephen Kinzer’s excellent Poisoner in Chief, which covers that material both more technicall­y and more engagingly.

Once over the fact that Brainwashe­d does not do what it says on the tin, there is the question of what it is doing. Brainwashi­ng has, as Pick notes, often proven “diffuse and difficult to define” but under his formulatio­n the diffusenes­s increases in order to cover

just about every way in which our brains are formed by the societies we live in. “Are we,” he asks rhetorical­ly, “educated, accosted, informed, accustomed, acclimatis­ed, habituated, normalised, familiaris­ed, influenced, nudged, conditione­d, shaped, manipulate­d, programmed or maybe even… brainwashe­d” to take for granted an order of the world that might just as well be otherwise? And if so, how might understand­ing the idea of brainwashi­ng in this sense enhance our ability to understand our own “contempora­ry lived experience­s of commerce and culture, society and politics” and “think about the hazards of thinking itself ”?

The result is six chapters that chart not so much the cultural history of brainwashi­ng as brainconst­ructing: what psychologi­sts call “subject formation”, seen here through the eyes of dozens of sociologis­ts, psychologi­sts, politician­s and admen over the last 70 years. Beginning with Hunter’s neologism in 1950, and passing through heated debates about the fragility of the human mind under totalitari­anism and groupthink, on to the deceptions of the “hidden persuaders” in consumer society, before winding up with the conspiracy theories and threats to democracy of the present, they are nothing if not rich in informatio­n.

And yet despite its admirable learning Brainwashe­d never takes off, even on its own terms. Often it feels like a heavily annotated reading list for a social psychology course – much of which, despite Pick’s twice repeated assertion that he is dealing with “largely forgotten” texts and debates, felt familiar even to this non-specialist. Elsewhere it sags under the weight of Pick’s prose, and his persistent refusal to summarise his own points as briefly as he does others’. But most curious of all is the fact that a book about influencin­g people should feel so ineptly preachy.

As Pick took his stand in the final pages on the climate crisis, our “hapless” prime minister and other “psycho-political concerns”, I counted myself fully among the choir being preached to, and yet felt like nothing so much as slipping off my surplice and leaving the church. Perhaps the problem is not so much the ways in which we are “cajoled and controlled” against our own interests, but the fact that those seeking to do the opposite are not half as good at it.

To order your copy for £16.99 call 0844 871 1514 or visit books.telegraph.co.uk

 ?? The Ipcress File ?? Cold War tactics: Michael Caine in the 1965 adaptation of Len Deighton’s
The Ipcress File Cold War tactics: Michael Caine in the 1965 adaptation of Len Deighton’s
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom