The Sunday Telegraph

How claims of anti-Israel bias rocked TikTok

The Chinese app is under scrutiny over handling of Hamas and a surge in online anti-Semitism. By Matthew Field

-

Members of TikTok’s Israel team woke up on the morning of Oct 7 to the sound of sirens blaring throughout Tel Aviv. Scrambling down to bomb shelters, while checking their phones, employees quickly realised the horror unfolding near the border with Gaza.

Videos of Hamas terrorists rampaging through southern Israel were going viral across social media – including on their app. Clips of paraglider­s circling over the Nova music festival or families begging for their lives were flooding their feeds.

Barak Herscowitz – at the time a government relations lead at TikTok in Israel – says the local team sprang into action: “It’s middle of the night in America, early morning in London, but some of the employees in TikTok rang all the bells, made all the right phone calls, and woke everyone up from their beds.”

A rapid crackdown on pro-Hamas accounts stemmed the initial “tsunami” of videos. For a brief moment, he was proud of the company’s response.

But the feeling did not last long. For some Israeli and Jewish employees at TikTok, the months since the massacre have left them increasing­ly disillusio­ned with the Chinese-owned company, prompting allegation­s of anti-Israel bias and questions over the company’s response to a surge of anti-Semitism online. Insiders also allege that TikTok staff have used internal chat forums to express sympathy for groups attacking Israel.

The internal backlash from Jewish employees was cited by US senators as they grilled Shou Zi Chew, TikTok’s chief executive, in February about safety concerns with social media.

The tensions come as TikTok, which is owned by China’s ByteDance, faces a possible ban in the US after Joe Biden signed a law that will block the app unless it is sold within nine months.

According to Herscowitz, his frustratio­ns began just days after Hamas’s attack. A former adviser to ex-Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett, Herscowitz was the main point of contact between the company and the government in Jerusalem.

However, he was quickly fielding complaints that TikTok – which has long had a policy of banning political advertisin­g – had blocked a swathe of Israeli government ads, alleging its slogans were too overtly political amid the crisis. Adverts for the Israeli volunteeri­ng group for young adults – Taglit – were also blocked, he claims.

Soon after, a social media campaign set up by the families of the 250 hostages seized by Hamas encountere­d the same problem. “It was just videos of the hostages before they were taken, mentioning how many days in the captivity of Hamas – this was also banned from TikTok, saying it’s political,” he says of the Bring Them Home Now campaign. At the same time, adverts for Palestinia­n aid, featuring graphic footage from the war, were approved. Herscowitz, who raised the discrepanc­y internally, says: “I just wanted things to be equal.”

Herscowitz adds that he also discovered troubling posts by some staff on the company’s internal messaging app, Lark. Among the posts were individual­s appearing to express support for Yemen’s Houthi rebels, who had just launched attacks on ships in the Red Sea to protest the military action in Gaza. A source says one message read: “Get you a friend that loves you the way Yemen loves Palestine”. Herscowitz alleges that the offending messages were largely written by members of TikTok’s trust and safety apparatus – the teams responsibl­e for the site’s moderation.

In December, Herscowitz put his name on an internal memo, shared with senior executives, that alleged the views of some of the company’s trust and safety team “very likely” influenced the moderation of the app.

Addressing the apparent block on hostage adverts, he wrote: “Labelling kidnapped babies, women, children, and elderly citizens who were taken from their beds by Hamas-Isis as a ‘political issue’ is, at the very least, one-sided.” After the note circulated around the company and later leaked to Fox News, Herscowitz was quizzed by senior managers but he said his concerns were never properly addressed. “They tried to please me by saying they had removed some of the messages [from Lark],” he says. “The real problem is that those employees with such radical views are in such sensitive positions.”

In the aftermath of the complaints, a number of Jewish employees were also blocked from accessing the proPalesti­nian support group within Lark, he claims. In January, Herscowitz quit TikTok, leaving a cryptic note on Twitter about his exit.

A TikTok spokesman said: “Following the horrific attacks of Oct 7, we immediatel­y mobilised significan­t resources and personnel to bolster our moderation teams and platform safety, including increased capacity in Hebrew and Arabic.

“Allegation­s from a former employee, who neither worked in or with our safety or moderation teams, mischaract­erise the significan­t efforts and resources we rapidly deployed to maintain the safety of our community and integrity of our platform.”

Months after Herscowitz’s departure and six months into the war, which has left 1,400 Israelis and 34,000 Palestinia­ns dead, TikTok quietly shifted its stance on the hostage adverts, allowing some previously blocked campaigns to run on the app.

Dorit Gvili, a Publicis One advertisin­g executive who has organised the Bring Them Home Now campaign, says the group finally ran two TikTok campaigns where they were permitted to use the word “hostages” after months of talks.

However, the families have chosen not to run any new campaigns on TikTok as its anti-terror policies effectivel­y block mentions of the word Hamas or any videos that are too “triggering”, she says. “The word Hamas was not even allowed on the landing page.” The group’s other campaigns have run on Google and Meta, she says, but “TikTok is the biggest and most influentia­l platform”.

A TikTok spokesman said the company had been “working intensivel­y” to bring the hostage campaign to its app. According to the company, TikTok previously blocked all war-related content, but it has since amended its rules to allow more humanitari­an campaigns. The company says there is no policy blocking the word “hostage”.

Concerns over TikTok’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war have been repeatedly raised by US senators amid a recent drive to ban the app.

A new law, which forces China’s ByteDance to sell the app by next January, was signed by President Biden last month, citing security fears that the app could be influenced by Beijing. But Senator Mitt Romney, a senior Republican and an advocate of the bill, also appeared to link the rapid passage of the law to alleged proPalesti­nian bias among TikTok users.

“Some wonder why there was such overwhelmi­ng support for us to shut down – potentiall­y – TikTok,” said the senator at an event on May 3.

“The number of mentions of Palestinia­ns, relative to other social media sites – it’s overwhelmi­ngly so among TikTok broadcasts”. The remarks have sparked a backlash from free speech activists.

Last week, TikTok sued the US government over its attempt to ban the app, arguing that the new law is “punitive and discrimina­tory” and an “extraordin­ary intrusion on free speech rights”. The company has repeatedly rejected claims it is biased against either side, arguing its posts simply reflect what its audience, dominated by younger millennial­s and Gen Z, is sharing.

In April, TikTok said it had removed 3.1m pieces of content originatin­g from Israel and Palestine since October, blocked 140,000 live streams in the region, and taken measures that resulted in a 234pc increase in the number of blocked comments that broke its rules.

Since leaving TikTok, Herscowitz says he has had over 150 messages of support from current and former employees. They are “doing their best to fight from within.” he says.

‘Labelling kidnapped women taken from their beds by HamasIsis as a “political issue” is very one-sided’

‘It was just video of the hostages, mentioning how many days in the captivity of Hamas – this was banned’

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom