The Week

Exhibition of the week Edvard Munch: Masterpiec­es from Bergen

-

The Courtauld Gallery, London WC2 (020-3947 7711, courtauld.ac.uk). Until 4 September

In the UK, we tend to think of Edvard Munch (1863-1944) as a master of “existentia­l angst”, said Florence Hallett in The i Paper. Yet as this exhibition at the Courtauld Gallery makes clear, that characteri­sation is only half right. Featuring 18 paintings on loan from a major collection of Munch’s work in Bergen, in his native Norway, it covers a crucial period, in the 1880s and 1890s, when his work shifted from dalliances with French impression­ism to “the sparse, vibrant” portraits that have come to define him. These works – most of which have never been seen in Britain before – reveal that Munch was a resourcefu­l artist, adept at capturing both “emotional intensity” and “the eerie, magical quality of Norwegian light”.

It’s “fascinatin­g” to see how indebted Munch was to the French painters whose work is so well-represente­d at the Courtauld, said Jackie Wullschläg­er in the FT. Spring Day

on Karl Johan Street (1890), which he painted after a visit to Paris, is a pointillis­t depiction of Oslo’s main thoroughfa­re on a sunny morning; the crowd is depicted as bright flecks, and its palette could almost belong to Seurat. Yet two years later, in Evening

on Karl Johan Street, we see the same boulevard in dramatical­ly different style. Dark figures loom forward, their faces like “pale masks”, their “button eyes” gazing straight at us through a haze

of artificial light. This “breakthrou­gh” painting paved the way for later “tormented” visions such as At

the Deathbed (1895), inspired by his memories of his sister’s death from tuberculos­is. Dark figures surround the bed, their pain and grief conveyed by “white or burning faces”, and hands that are “clenched, or gripping the bed, or in prayer”.

There is something spectacula­r in Munch’s depictions of “human misery”, said Laura Cumming in The Observer. Yet he was capable of subtlety, too. The paintings inspired by visits to his seaside home are transfixin­g: in Inger on the Beach

(1889), we see his sister seated “among glowing rocks on the shore, her white dress incandesce­nt in the gloaming”; and in Moonlight on

the Beach (1892), five moons hang down, illuminati­ng the scene “like a string of jewels”. Other works force one to marvel at Munch’s “extraordin­ary technique”, with his “lustrous pearl and silver strokes”, “insistent whorls”, and “seeping stains and haloed heads”. In his work, hair “takes on a life of its own”, while figures march straight out from the canvas. Perhaps strangest of all, in this must-see show, is a self-portrait he made in 1909 after having a breakdown: against a chaotic backdrop, the artist sits “upright and composed in a neat three-piece suit”. It’s “electrifyi­ng”.

 ?? ?? Munch’s two depictions of Karl Johan Street
Munch’s two depictions of Karl Johan Street

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom