Towpath Talk

Landmark judgment confirms housing benefit for boat licence fees

-

IN A landmark judgment issued on June 25, 2020, the Upper Tribunal has confirmed that housing benefit is payable for boat licence fees because the boat licence fee if living aboard is rent.

Specifical­ly it is a payment in respect of a licence or permission to occupy a dwelling and thus it qualifies under Regulation 12(1)(b) of the Housing Benefit Regulation­s. Regulation 12(1)(b) is directly transposed to the Universal Credit Regulation­s so this judgment also applies to claims for the boat licence fee as housing costs in Universal Credit.

In the case brought against the London Borough of Camden, the boater, referred to as Mr B, was represente­d by barrister Justin Bates, instructed by the National Bargee Travellers Associatio­n (NBTA).

Upper Tribunal Judge Mr E Mitchell found that the boat licence without a permanent mooring qualifies under this regulation because the boat dweller without a permanent mooring is required to make a payment in respect of a licence to occupy the land, including land covered with water, that while moored, comprises part of his houseboat dwelling.

Although the decision was made in respect of a boat licensed without a home mooring, it also covers boat licences with a home mooring (housing benefit for mooring fees is already within the scope of the regulation­s in Regulation 12(1)(f ) which is also transposed to the Universal Credit Regulation­s).

In paragraph 69 of the judgment, Judge Mitchell said: “...a ‘dwelling’ is comprised of more than simply the houseboat. It includes the land used for the purposes of mooring it.

“When a houseboat is moored, the dwelling is comprised for housing benefit purposes of the houseboat itself, the canal or river bank used for mooring and, probably, also the land beneath the vessel (given the Interpreta­tion Act 1978 definition of land, which includes land covered by water).

“If someone other than the person dwelling in the houseboat owns the land comprised within the houseboat dwelling, the owner in principle is free to licence its use, for mooring purposes, to that person.”

He continued in paragraphs 82 and 83: “I therefore conclude that payments made by Mr B to the Canal & River Trust were payments in respect of a licence to occupy that part of his houseboat dwelling comprised of land owned or managed by the trust.

“It is not disputed that the payments are periodical in nature nor that they are made in respect of a dwelling occupied by Mr B as his home. The payments therefore fall within regulation 12(1)(b) of the 2006 Regulation­s and constitute ‘rent’ for the purposes of that regulation.

“It follows that the local authority, acting on December 1, 2016, did not establish a proper statutory ground for supersedin­g Mr B’s award of housing benefit. The authority’s decision is set aside.

“For entitlemen­t purposes, the result is that the authority’s actions on December 1, 2016, had no effect on Mr B’s existing housing benefit award. That is the effect of the decision given before the start of the reasons for this decision.”

The judge also decided that the costs of compulsory third party insurance and Boat Safety Scheme examinatio­n did not qualify for housing benefit under Regulation 12(1)(b) on the grounds that these payments “...were made in respect of services necessary in order for the conditions for grant of a licence to be satisfied” and were not payments in respect of the boat licence itself.

The judge made it clear that he was not drawing a distinctio­n between a boat licence without a home mooring, a boat licence with a home mooring or a houseboat certificat­e: the decision covers all three. He also used the word ‘houseboat’ in the everyday sense to mean a boat that is used as a home.

This decision follows a difficult period for boat dwellers due to an adverse judgment in the Upper Tribunal in 2017 (Kirklees MBC v JM) which was undefended by the boater and which had reversed a Social Security and Child Support Commission­ers’ decision of 2002 that boat licence fees, regardless of whether the boater had a mooring, were eligible for housing benefit.

From 2017, many boat dwellers both with and without a home mooring saw the housing benefit for their boat licence either withdrawn on review or refused with a new claim.

If you have been refused housing benefit for the boat licence fee or if your housing benefit was stopped, you can now either make a new claim or seek permission to appeal out of time. The same applies to those who claimed Universal Credit for the boat licence fee and were refused.

If your housing benefit was refused or stopped and you did not appeal, you may be able to get permission to appeal out of time. If you did appeal, your appeal should have been stayed pending the outcome of this case and you should now contact the tribunal with the judgment. If you appealed and your appeal was not stayed but was decided against you, then you should contact the tribunal for permission to appeal out of time.

The full judgment is available at http://mrtns.uk/abvlbc

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom