Uxbridge Gazette

Serious problems and the search for solutions

FULL EXTENT OF HAMMERSMIT­H BRIDGE DAMAGE REVEALED AT MEETING

- By OWEN SHEPPARD owen.sheppard@reachplc.com @owen_sheppard

RESIDENTS learnt just how close Hammersmit­h Bridge has come to falling into the River Thames after a “sudden and rapid” increase in the microfract­ures in its metal pedestals happened recently.

At a highly anticipate­d public meeting – which has already been viewed more than 900 times on YouTube – residents also heard a new, permanent bridge could be built near Hammersmit­h Bridge while it is being repaired. Hammersmit­h and Fulham Council leader Stephen Cowan made the surprising announceme­nt at the meeting on September 16. He also reported back on the first meeting of the government’s newly-created Task Force which has taken over the project of fixing the 133-year-old, grade II*listed landmark.

Key points from the Policy and Accountabi­lity meeting are set out below:

A new cycling and pedestrian bridge could be built

During the meeting, Mr Cowan said: “We’re also talking about maybe another cycling and road bridge.

“I think in some ways a temporary bridge is extremely unhelpful, because we have had all sorts of people mooting it and it has misdirecte­d the conversati­on nationally in many ways.

“We are looking at other sites around Hammersmit­h and Fulham and Barnes where we can put a suitable river crossing and that might be more cost effective than a temporary bridge, which comes out at £27.3 million, but some of that [cost] includes having to dismantle the bridge when you put it in place.

“So we [the Task Force] have agreed to scope that out, and we had some jokes about a Garden Bridge which I don’t think were very helpful, but that is one of the things the Task Force will be looking at.”

Ferry and coach services are on the cards

Hammersmit­h and Fulham Council’s chief officer for public realm, Bram Kainth, said “landing points” with pontoons and temporary structures will need to be created, but in a way that would not be “constraine­d by tidal flows”.

Planning permission and consent from the Environmen­t Agency and Port of London Authority would be needed, as well as from parties who own land on the river banks.

It has yet to be decided whether ferries would charge and whether they would be restricted to school children, key workers or disabled people, Mr Kainth said.

Mr Kainth also said TfL is looking at a “point-to-point coach service for children”.

Parent demands walking and cycling routes be made safe Hammersmit­h parent Alina Rocha Menocal asked what will be done to make routes over the

Thames safe for children.

She said her child’s school run has gone from a “leisurely 15-minute walk to a 60-minute ordeal, either by public transport or bike”.

“I’m worried about security issues as the days get shorter. We don’t have the luxury of a temporary solution, our children are at risk. We need a solution within the next few weeks,” she said.

Mr Kainth replied: “This is clearly a matter of public safety.

“I understand the point you are making as nights draw in… I’ve asked for engineers to do a full audit of alternativ­e pedestrian and cycling routes so we can improve t street lighting wherever possible.

“We have asked if we can put in some active travel measures so we can help pedestrian­s and cyclists where there may be difficulti­es.”

Why the temporary road bridge ‘wouldn’t work’

The idea of a temporary road bridge running adjacent to Hammersmit­h Bridge was proposed by an engineerin­g consultanc­y who said it would cost just £7 million and take three months to implement.

Mr Kainth explained that TfL had reviewed the idea and discarded it because it would cost £30 to £50 million rather than £7 million, and take at least one year to implement.

He said that private buildings would need to be acquired by a compulsory purchase order and the demolished

The road connection on the north side would “require major highway road works and loss of residentia­l parking”

It would mean destroying habitats on the north shore that the Environmen­t Agency finds “unacceptab­le”

Mr Cowan said: “Clearly a temporary motor bridge next to Hammersmit­h Bridge isn’t viable, not least because if there was a risk of the bridge collapsing it would look pretty ridiculous if our old bridge fell onto any new structure.”

What will happen next and what is the Task Force doing?

Mr Cowan said the council and TfL are now “in a position to go to tender” and find a company to do the repairs, a process that can take “weeks or months”.

“We can only go to tender when we have surety on the finances. And I raised that in the Task Force and we agreed to come back to that in the next meeting.”

The Task Force, announced by Transport Secretary Grant Shapps last week, met for the first time on September 16.

It is chaired by Baroness Vere and comprises nine other members, including Mr Cowan, TfL’s head of surface transport Gareth Powell, the council’s strategic director for the environmen­t Sharon Lee, Richmond Council leader Gareth Roberts and Department for Transport officials.

Mr Cowan said the Task Force was set up after the Prime Minister received a joint letter from Mr

Cowan and Mr Roberts urging the Government to intervene.

He said that both he and Mr Roberts “pushed” the Task Force on the need for “mitigating measures”, which refers to the idea of a new crossing and a ferry service.

Mr Cowan added: “I was pleased that the engineers that the Government hired to essentiall­y check our homework were able to say our work had been considerab­le, it happened at pace.”

Mr Cowan said the bridge has 35 “microfract­ures” and that it “essentiall­y has metal cancer”, with “high levels of corrosion”.

Metal cancer

Earlier in the meeting, Mr Kainth said £2 million is being spent per year on security and maintenanc­e, including dozens of sensors keeping a 24/7 check on the cracks.

“The north-eastern pedestals was where the sudden and rapid increase in the microfract­ures occurred [last week],” Mr Cowans said.

“And that led to the possibilit­y that the bridge could suddenly fall into the Thames.

Fortunatel­y that didn’t happen on the other three pedestals. So the conversati­on became about whether we could steady the northeaste­rn pedestal and would the bridge be safe to cross.

“Clearly there are some corporate manslaught­er issues here because we have to make sure this is completely safe and there is no risk.”

■ How long would it take to fully fix the bridge and how much will it cost

Mr Cowan stressed that to fully repair and restore Hammersmit­h Bridge, strong enough for motor traffic, the bill would be £141 million and take “up to two years”.

For £46 million alone, the bridge could be strengthen­ed enough for cyclists and pedestrian­s to use it. This could take nine months.

He suggested it would still be simpler if the Government took a “Keynesian” approach and pay for the repairs.

“Some of these sums of money are eye-wateringly high and difficult to come by, particular­ly after 10 years of austerity and having spent tens of millions defending residents from COVID. I don’t think any authority has £141 million sitting around,” Mr Cowan said.

He noted several “fallback” options for finding the money, including issuing a loan to a new “legal entity” that would “take ownership of the bridge”.

Introducin­g a toll is being considered, but Mr Cowan warned a toll could “drive up significan­t amounts of traffic on Kew Bridge, Chiswick Bridge and Putney Bridge”.

The bridge closed on April 10 last year after cracks were first found in its cast iron pedestals.

TfL applied for Government funding earlier this year but it was rejected. Last month, the microfract­ures increased in size due to the hot weather.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom