West Sussex County Times

Cricket tea vote causes a big stir

-

A decision from the Sussex Cricket League to stop the provision of teas has caused quite a stir.

At the league’s AGM on Monday night, the vote on removing the provision of teas wascarried, with89abst­aining or against and 114 in favour.

They added: “There will still be a breakof30m­inutesandc­lubswillbe expected to provide a choice of hot and cold drinks for players and officials.”

It causedahug­ereactiono­nsocial media from local clubs and players – and a former England captain.

Players, scorers and umpires were asked to bring their own teas during this year’s August Cup because of Covid regulation­s.

But now the league has voted for home teams to no longer provide teas.

Chairman Gary Stanley told BBC Sport: “With the pandemic, the cricket we played was a short season and there was no option to provide teas, everyone had to provide their own food as it wasn’t allowed. Lots of clubs, and this was proposed by six or seven of them, came to us and said ‘we want to propose that the obligation to provide teas for 2021 is removed’. This is only for 2021 - it can bechangedf­orthefollo­wingseason.”

Butthemove­causedupse­taround Sussex and further afield.

FormerEngl­andskipper­Michael Vuaghan tweeted: “As i f 2020 couldn’t get any worse .. hearing a cricket league down south is getting rid of theCricket­teatopsthe­lot.. Utterly disgracefu­l decision .. #OnOn #Cricket #SaveOurTea­s”

It also appears there was confusion – with clubs who did not turn up to the AGM deemed to NOT vote against the proposal to axe teas.

The Sussex Cricket League had not responded to our request for a statement as we went to press.

Players and clubs have given a mixed reaction on social media.

Replying to the SCL’s tweet, Rich Mamoany said: “Absolute SHAMBLESan­dshameonth­osewhovote­d it out. #Shambles #bringbackt­eas.”

Ditchling Cricket Club tweeted: “The clubs who were not on the call weredeemed­tohavevote­dfortherem­oval of teas? That was not fair and the voting figures do not reflect who actually wantedtore­moveteas. This needs rethinking.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom