Salisbury attack: RT loses appeal

NEWS channel RT has lost its Court of Appeal challenge over a £200,000 fine for breaches of impartiality rules in broadcasts about the Salisbury poisoning and the war in Syria.

Ofcom sanctioned the Kremlinbacked broadcaster, formerly known as Russia Today, over seven news and current affairs programmes between March 17 and April 26 2018, which the watchdog found breached the requirement for news to be presented with “due impartiality”.

Two of the sanctioned broadcasts were editions of Sputnik, presented by former MP George Galloway, which covered the poisoning of Russian ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury in March 2018.

RT challenged Ofcom’s decision at the High Court, arguing that it breached its right to freedom of expression, and that the watchdog failed to take account of the “dominant media narrative” in relation to the Salisbury poisoning.

After losing the High Court bid in March 2020, RT brought a Court of Appeal challenge earlier this year. However, in a ruling yesterday, three senior judges dismissed RT’s appeal.

Sir Geoffrey Vos, sitting with Lord Justice Baker and Lord Justice Warby, said: “The fact that there is a dominant media narrative that is different from the views expressed in RT’s programmes does not, by itself, override the special impartiality requirements that apply to programmes dealing with matters of political controversy and current public policy.”

The judges found that references to opposing views were made in the sanctioned programmes, but “were either sarcastic or ridiculing”.

“Having watched the programmes themselves, I can say that the programmes were each partial and unbalanced. They were seemingly deliberately so,” Sir Geoffrey added.

He concluded: “Even if one makes the assumption that RT viewers may, in some or even most cases, be aware of the contrary views expressed in mainstream media, that is not sufficient to outweigh the requirement for due impartiality in programming on matters of political controversy.”

In its ruling last year, the High Court found that a lack of due impartiality “would severely harm the quality of political discourse in this country and in doing so seriously harm the rights of others”.

In their decision, the Court of Appeal judges found: “The enforcement action taken by Ofcom against RT in respect of each of the programmes was indeed necessary in a democratic society in the interests of the protection of the rights of members of that democratic society in general and the viewers of RT in particular.”