Western Daily Press

Soldier, 22, killed by elephant charge ‘had no protection’

SEASONAL DISCOUNT VOUCHERS WORTH OVER £65

- RICHARD VERNALLS news@westerndai­lypress.co.uk

ABRITISH soldier killed by an elephant charge on an antipoachi­ng operation was “deprived of one of the main protective measures” after a ban on the use of warning shots, a coroner has concluded.

Guardsman Mathew Talbot of the 1st Battalion the Coldstream Guards was fatally injured in the incident in Liwonde National Park in Malawi on May 5, 2019.

A week-long inquest into the soldier’s death at Oxford Coroner’s Court, concluding on Monday, heard evidence of how warning shots against dangerous game had been banned, under the Army’s rules of engagement.

After hearing evidence, the senior coroner, Darren Salter, said the reasons for this prohibitio­n were “still not entirely clear”. He was told the use of force rules had since been changed, allowing warning shots on anti-poaching operations.

The 22-year-old, of Great Barr, West Midlands, suffered fatal chest and soft tissue injuries while on day three of an eight-day patrol.

Gdsm Talbot, who “loved the Army”, was part of a five-man mixed Malawian and British group on his first operationa­l tour when he was attacked.

His parents, Steve and Michelle Talbot, said their son was “badly let down by” Army planners, adding that “had the right things been put in place” he may have survived.

A Ministry of Defence (MoD) service inquiry, published in October last year and shared with the inquest, concluded there had been several failings and made 30 recommenda­tions.

The coroner said the availabili­ty of a person medically qualified to insert a chest drain to treat Gdsm Talbot and the presence of a med-evac helicopter “may have led to Mathew’s survival”.

He said evidence had been heard about an Army risk assessment, stating that casualties should reach hospital within four hours of an incident, known as the medical timeline. That included an “overly optimistic assessment of the capability of the available Land Rover”, to be used to move any casualties.

The coroner said the “underestim­ate of the impact of an attack by dangerous game and the length of time to move the patient by road, meant the (medical) timeline was not achievable”.

Turning to three “contributo­ry causes” to the death, also borne out in the service inquiry, he said: “Firstly, it was known from two previous deployment patrols... elephant grass should be avoided. This should have been made clearer, particular­ly when the helicopter was unavailabl­e.

“Secondly, the wrong immediate actions for an elephant attack; namely climbing a tree, taken in the heat of the moment.”

He added: “I think, as has been recognised, there should have been refresher training and reinforcem­ent of what the correct actions were to be taken when faced by an elephant attack.”

Turning to the third factor, the use of warning shots, he said: “To be honest, I am still not entirely clear why they were not permitted. I’ve heard reasons they weren’t permitted but those reasons don’t seem terribly convincing.

“But the result of that is Mathew and his fellow soldiers were deprived of one of the main protective measures.

“Warning shots were known to be effective (on a previous operation), but I would have thought actually that’s something which is fairly obvious.”

He added, “warning shots appear to have been effective afterwards”, as the elephants were scared off by the African park rangers using their guns.

Mr Salter said: “I note actually in terms of contributo­ry causes, those three things; patrolling in elephant grass, the wrong immediate actions, and the prohibitio­n of warning shots are essentiall­y the three contributo­ry causes identified by the service inquiry.”

Gdsm Talbot and his patrol were navigating through two-metre-high elephant grass when they spotted three elephants 30 metres ahead. As they tried to backtrack, the soldier was injured when another elephant, unseen, charged the patrol from the side.

The British Army sergeant commanding the group managed to climb a tree but as Gdsm Talbot tried to do the same he “was caught by the charging elephant”, the coroner found.

“He was knocked and thrown into the air and then injured by the elephant’s tusks while on the ground,” added Mr Salter.

The coroner found there was initial “highly commendabl­e” lifesaving treatment in the field, before the injured soldier was stretchere­d to a Land Rover, which set off for the park’s gates. However, progress was slow over the rough terrain and Gdsm Talbot suffered a cardiac arrest and died more than four hours after the incident – the hospital still two hours’ drive away.

“If Gdsm Talbot had reached hospital within four hours of sustaining injuries, it is likely he would have survived,” Mr Salter said.

After delivering a narrative conclusion, Mr Salter said: “It is right to recognise the task that Mathew was engaged upon. A task he himself considered very important.

“Indeed I was struck, and recall the statement where he said it was a combinatio­n of being a soldier and David Attenborou­gh, and that did strike a chord.”

You’ll need TWO codes to redeem this offer, another code is below – so don’t delay!

This pack contains everything you need to get in the Christmas spirit, and we’ve covered the seasonal essentials which will help make this December merry and bright.

10 x beautiful Christmas cards and envelopes 2 x A2 sheets of wrapping paper 10 x matching gift tags A festive 100 page puzzle book A seasonal santa hat to get you in the Christmas spirit

www.inyourarea.co.uk/go/christmasp­ack

 ?? ?? As the festive season approaches, we’re offering 3000 readers the chance to get prepared with an amazing FREE Christmas Pack!*
As the festive season approaches, we’re offering 3000 readers the chance to get prepared with an amazing FREE Christmas Pack!*
 ?? Irwin Mitchell ?? > Guardsman Mathew Talbot, with parents Steve and Michelle Talbot
Irwin Mitchell > Guardsman Mathew Talbot, with parents Steve and Michelle Talbot

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom