Western Mail

Incinerato­r an eco hazard to health

-

I’M against the Barry incinerato­r

Many people have asked me on the doorsteps if I am for or against the proposed Barry incinerato­r and I would like to make it clear that I am vehemently opposed to it.

I am opposed because incinerati­on results in high levels of greenhouse gas emissions. For every tonne of waste burned, typically more than one tonne of CO2 is released into the atmosphere, and the alternativ­es to incinerati­on are cheaper, more flexible, faster to implement and far better for the environmen­t.

As a resident of the town, I fully support the majority who are against the incinerato­r as over-capacity in incinerati­on undermines waste prevention, the re-use and recycling of materials – although I fully agree that we do need more job opportunit­ies in the town.

But we must remember, in addition to greenhouse gas emissions that exacerbate climate change, incinerato­rs (including gasificati­on and pyrolysis plants) emit many toxins and pollutants and give rise to public health concerns. Recycling is also harmed by incinerati­on for various reasons, including the over-presence of incinerati­on capacity.

Also, the residents of the town must bear in mind that those living near incinerato­rs report having had to deal with problems such as noise, odour, traffic, visual intrusion, worsened air quality and light pollution. Therefore, we must do all we can to stop this incinerato­r gaining an operating licence in our town.

Councillor Richard Bertin Independen­t, Vale of Glamorgan Council

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom