Western Mail

Onus is on all to evolve with the way we work

- Matt Southall is group managing director of multi-specialist recruiter Acorn MATT SOUTHALL

IT will come as no surprise that I watch trends and developmen­ts within the employment sector extremely closely.

As MD of one of the UK’s leading recruitmen­t companies, I have to be aware of any changes to our industry in order to ensure that we continue to be able to support employers and jobseekers as best as possible.

Last week, the world of work was once again making the headlines with the publicatio­n of the Taylor Review, a report on the future of work in the UK.

The report covered a variety of topics, but the ones that seem to have generated the most column inches were the recommenda­tions made for the gig economy.

I last wrote about the gig economy back in September and since then it has continued to grow in prominence and size, with recent estimates suggesting that as many as 1.1 million people in the UK are now gig workers.

However, while awareness of the type of work has certainly increased, the grey areas around employment conditions and workers’ rights remain. Opinion is divided regarding the pros and cons of the gig economy.

Some believe that workers having total freedom in their working lives gives them a level of flexibilit­y they have never known in the past.

Others have argued that this type of contract could signal a return to the terrible working conditions reminiscen­t of the pre-industrial era, when people were virtually enslaved to their employer.

Certainly, the Taylor Review didn’t suggest that the practise was in any way Dickensian, or in need of eliminatio­n, rather it took the much more measured view that there is a need for greater flexibilit­y and pay.

The Review also coined the phrase “dependent contractor”, meaning that these workers sit somewhere between an employee and someone who is genuinely selfemploy­ed. The Taylor Review makes several recommenda­tions, including the suggestion that anyone who takes on employment in the gig economy should have their rights laid out to them on day one, and in “plain English”.

Arguably, this is something that should happen in all jobs and contracts, regardless of their nature – everyone should be clear about where they stand from the outset.

This report comes on the back of a tribunal ruling last year that Uber workers are entitled to earn the minimum wage.

The judges in the case said that drivers must be viewed as “workers” and therefore are deserving of basic rights, such as the national minimum wage, paid holidays and limited working hours.

Unions have stepped in on behalf of gig workers and have been quick to flag the fact that workers are being exploited, and it is worth noting that Uber is in the process of challengin­g this ruling.

Of course, as with all things employment, the Government has to be careful to walk the important line between ensuring that workers are sufficient­ly protected, while allowing businesses to grow.

Certainly, any successful businesspe­rson will be quick to say that at the heart of any successful, sustainabl­e business is likely to be a happy workforce, and with MP Frank Field estimating that some delivery drivers are making less than £2.50 an hour there clearly need to be changes.

Ultimately, the way we work is constantly evolving and will continue to, probably quicker than ever. What is crucial is that employers have to evolve with these changes, and workers have to be aware of their rights. The onus is on all of us.

 ?? Dan Kitwood ?? > Some believe that gig workers having total freedom in their working lives gives them a level of flexibilit­y they have never known in the past
Dan Kitwood > Some believe that gig workers having total freedom in their working lives gives them a level of flexibilit­y they have never known in the past
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom