Western Mail

Maximum stake cut on fixed-odds betting terminals

- Helen William & Catherine Wylie newsdesk@walesonlin­e.co.uk

THE maximum stake on fixedodds betting terminals (FOBTs) – known as the crack cocaine of gambling – is to be cut from £100 to between £50 and £2.

The high-stake, high-speed electronic casino games are said to be dangerousl­y addictive and currently allow a stake of up to £100 every 20 seconds, enabling a player to theoretica­lly gamble away £18,000 an hour.

Bookmakers fear the plan, part of a package of measures announced in the government’s gambling review, will not work and will have a negative impact on the high street, causing job losses and “ruining the lives of the thousands of employees”.

But others believe it does not go far enough, describing it as “deeply disappoint­ing” and raising concerns that the process is taking too long.

Culture Minister Tracey Crouch said: “It is vital that we strike the right balance between socially responsibl­e growth and protecting the most vulnerable, including children, from gambling-related harm.”

Raising standards of player protection for online gambling, a responsibl­e gambling campaign and new advertisin­g guidelines are among a raft of suggestion­s designed to help minimise the risk to vulnerable people and children.

Strengthen­ing the code on responsibl­e gambling advertisin­g and responsibl­e gambling initiative­s are also being considered.

A 12-week consultati­on is being launched on the proposals, which are aimed at reducing the potential for large losses on the machines.

Malcolm George, chief executive of the Associatio­n of British Bookmakers, said the government has “some intelligen­t ideas”.

But he told the BBC: “They’ve looked at the evidence that was submitted last year, and they haven’t come down with a firm view because actually the evidence around cutting stake doesn’t necessaril­y suggest you’re going to help problem gamblers.

“The risk for the industry as a whole is that you simply move a problem gambler from one environmen­t into another, into an amusement arcade, into a casino, into online. And that mightn’t be the best policy outcome.”

Mr George said “losing 12,000 jobs” is “a very high price to pay” for a measure he said might not work and which may drive gamblers “undergroun­d into the hands of money-lenders”.

He added: “Just cutting stake to £2, ruining the lives of the thousands of employees who will lose their jobs, ruining the high street and the attraction betting shops provide, when it won’t actually be a benefit to a problem gambler, that simply doesn’t make sense.”

But shadow culture secretary and Labour deputy leader Tom Watson described the government’s announceme­nt as “deeply disappoint­ing”.

He added: “Ministers have squandered a real opportunit­y to curb highly addictive fixed-odds betting terminals.

“After months of delays they’ve simply decided to have another consultati­on. And instead of taking firm measures on the proliferat­ion of gambling advertisin­g, on TV and online, the government have again been found wanting.”

The government has also asked the Gambling Commission for more informatio­n about how better tracking and monitoring of play on FOBTs might be used to protect players.

They have also asked to see if the spin speed on games such as roulette should be looked at.

From April 2018 the Assembly will have the power to regulate gaming machines authorised by a new betting premises licence where the maximum charge for a single play is more than £10.

An annual budget of £5m to £7m has been earmarked for a two-year advertisin­g campaign backed by GambleAwar­e, Adver-

 ?? Daniel Hambury ?? > The maximum amount a punter can stake on a single spin is to be cut following growing disquiet among politician­s about the harm being caused on Britain’s high streets by the FOBTs
Daniel Hambury > The maximum amount a punter can stake on a single spin is to be cut following growing disquiet among politician­s about the harm being caused on Britain’s high streets by the FOBTs

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom