Western Mail

Welsh tourism tax rears its ugly head once again

- DYLAN JONES-EVANS Dylan Jones-Evans is Professor of Entreprene­urship at the University of South Wales.

LAST year the Welsh Government announced that it would be considerin­g the introducti­on of new taxes in light of the fiscal responsibi­lities that have been awarded to Wales.

These included a tax on disposable plastics – such as coffee cups – that cannot be recycled; a vacant land tax which would address the issue of socalled “land banks” which restricts the land available for new housing; and a levy to support social care.

However, probably the most controvers­ial among the business community was the proposal to introduce a tourism tax which would be a small charge on visitors staying in accommodat­ion.

This seems like deja vu all over again and takes me back to the controvers­y, more than 11 years ago, when the Local Government Associatio­n recommende­d that a “bed tax” should be set to fund public transport schemes.

At the time, a proposed 10% per night on all overnight accommodat­ion – added to the 17.5% of VAT – could have resulted in the UK becoming one of the highest-taxed holiday destinatio­ns in Europe.

Fortunatel­y, this proposal was quietly dropped due to massive opposition from the tourism industry, but it would seem that this whole issue has been raised again by those advising the Welsh Government on new taxation.

Of course, we don’t know what rates would be charged by the Welsh Government but, as everyone knows, the problem is that once a new tax is introduced, it is then an easy option to increase it when there are budget shortfalls in other areas.

Naturally, there is concern given that the UK already has one of the highest levels of taxation on tourism businesses compared to other European countries because of the level of VAT charged.

In fact, only Lithuania charges VAT at a higher rate than the UK, with lower rates in many other countries including Ireland (9%), Netherland­s (6%) and Spain (10%).

In addition, whatever tax would be levied would not, at this moment, be charged in England, thus arguably placing Welsh tourism businesses at a potential competitiv­e disadvanta­ge.

Not surprising­ly, tourism operators across Wales have suggested that introducin­g such a tax could have devastatin­g effect in Wales, where the tourism industry generates nearly £9n for the economy and supports around 242,000 jobs. This is at a time when there are significan­t challenges, not least from our eventual exit from Europe.

The Bevan Foundation – which proposed the tourism tax through its 2016 Tax for Good project – has pointed out that tourism results in greater traffic congestion, higher levels of waste and the need for increased maintenanc­e of key attraction­s. As a result, it believes that it is only fair and reasonable to charge tourists to meet these extra costs to the taxpayer from the activities of those visiting the country.

Others who support the introducti­on of this tax argue that other countries such as Spain and Italy have introduced it with little effect, although this seems to be for different purposes than just raising revenue.

For example, a new Sustainabl­e Tourist Tax is being introduced for visitors to Mallorca and Ibiza to raise money towards the protection of resources on the islands.

So the question is whether this is just another way of raising taxation within Wales or whether the revenue raised will really go towards improving the tourism facilities as promised. To be fair, the Bevan Foundation has suggested that if this tax is pursued, it is important that the revenue is earmarked to support the local tourism industry in some way so that operators do not feel their customers are being unfairly targeted.

However, some doubt that it will do this and, as every driver knows, very little of the road and petrol tax charged on cars has actually gone to improve the transport infrastruc­ture in this country. In fact, how soon before Assembly Members make the case to use the tourism tax to support other critical areas of funding?

In addition, it would be a dramatic own goal for a Welsh Government to offer up to £300m to one company to support the Swansea Tidal Lagoon – even though it is one of the most important potential developmen­ts for the economy – while creating a tax that will hit tens of thousands of small firms in the tourism sector.

Therefore, it is probable that one of the other three taxes will be chosen to be implemente­d. However, if the Welsh Government does decide otherwise, then at a time when Wales is trying to develop a sustainabl­e high value-added tourism industry, it is critical that it fully consults with tourism operators before any potential introducti­on, to understand the impact that any new tax could have upon them and their businesses at a time the economy will be facing unpreceden­ted challenges following Brexit.

 ?? Visit Wales Image Centre ?? > Would revenue from a proposed tourism tax really go towards maintainin­g key attraction­s such as Harlech Castle?
Visit Wales Image Centre > Would revenue from a proposed tourism tax really go towards maintainin­g key attraction­s such as Harlech Castle?
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom