Western Mail

Veiled motives in debate over burka

-

I WRITE in response to First Minister Carwyn Jones’ article on support for the burka.

His accusation­s that Boris Johnson and Gareth Bennett are seeking “political advantage” in attacking Muslim women who wear the burka is rather hypocritic­al as a Labour politician, given the antics of his leader Jeremy Corbyn over anti Semitism.

Apparently, Johnson and Bennett are being xenophobic, irresponsi­ble and racist. Xenophobia usually refers to a person’s nationalit­y and culture, rather than exclusivel­y their race.

In that respect, both Boris Johnson and Gareth Bennett are not using their accusation­s for “political advantage” but are concerned about the Muslim culture of wearing a burka or niqab.

Why these politician­s are so ridiculed beggars belief, when no less than 13 countries have banned the burka, with the majority being in the EU.

The covering of the face is very controvers­ial and raises questions of security, social intergrati­on and personal freedom.

Why the hierachy of the UK (and in particular politician­s) support such a controvers­ial tradition raises the question “are they doing it for political gain?” – in opposition to Carwyn Jones’ accusation­s!

A majority of Islamic countries, such as Turkey, Chad and Cameroon, have even banned the wearing of the burka and make the point that the wearing of such facial veils is not supported in the Quran!

With reference to support for the burka, you only have to go on Facebook to see the widespread support for the banning of such a veil. Mr M Stafford Brackla, Bridgend

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom