Western Mail

MS did not break code over shares

- MARTIN SHIPTON Political editor-at-large newsdesk@walesonlin­e.co.uk

WELSH Labour MS Jenny Rathbone did not break the code of conduct for Senedd Members when she failed to mention before speaking in a debate that she has shares in one of the firms that manufactur­es Covid-19 vaccines, the body’s Standards Commission­er has ruled.

Douglas Bain decided this week that a complaint against the Cardiff Central MS was inadmissib­le because there was no evidence she would profit further from her shareholdi­ng in the pharmaceut­ical company AstraZenec­a.

Under the Senedd’s standing orders, MSs have to register shareholdi­ngs when they are of a market value greater than 1% of the company’s issued share capital or when they are worth more than 50% of the basic MS salary, currently £67,649.

A complaint from an individual whose name has been redacted by the Commission­er stated: “I would like to inform you that I am extremely concerned to learn that Jenny Rathbone who voted in favour of the introducti­on of vaccine passports in Wales ... has shares in the pharmaceut­ical company AstraZenec­a.

“This is a major conflict of interest and I understand that AstraZenec­a/ Jenny stand to gain huge financial windfalls this year.”

Mr Bain responded: “The particular decision to be taken in the debate on October 5 was whether or not to approve the regulation­s requiring a Covid passport to gain entry to nightclubs.

“You have produced no evidence to satisfy me that there was any likelihood of Ms Rathbone gaining financiall­y as a result of that decision.

“It was contended by some that introducti­on of the passport would lead to an increase in the vaccinatio­n rate amongst those, mainly young, people who frequent nightclubs. But even if that was so the ‘extra’ vaccinatio­ns could have been with any of the three vaccines currently in use in Wales. And even if the ‘extra’ vaccinatio­ns were all with the AstraZenec­a vaccine the extra profit for AstraZenec­a would, given the small numbers, have been miniscule and immaterial.

“There is no rational basis for believing that the decision taken on October 5 could result in an increased dividend being paid to Ms Rathbone or in an increase in the value of her holding.”

Ms Rathbone has been made aware of further suggestion­s of conflicts of interest relating to contributi­ons made by her at the Senedd in policy areas where she owns shares.

She has spoken negatively about Pfizer, suggesting it may be more practical to use the AstraZenec­a vaccine, which doesn’t have to be stored in refrigerat­ors at a very cold temperatur­e.

And she has championed food sustainabi­lity, even though she has shareholdi­ngs in firms interested in investing in sustainabl­e food.

Ms Rathbone said: “I believe this is being stirred up against me as part of an attempt to divert attention from the financial allegation­s relating to Conservati­ve MPs in Westminste­r.

“I had no financial interest In asking the Auditor General in the Public Accounts Committee whether all health boards had adequate storage arrangemen­ts for the Pfizer vaccine as the purpose of the question was to ensure that no vaccine was wasted.

“Equally there was no financial interest in expressing concern that the AstraZenec­a allocation for Wales had apparently not yet been donated to developing countries by the UK Government as part of our commitment to a globally responsibl­e Wales.

“Trying to link my longstandi­ng campaignin­g for clean air in schools located close to polluted highways in my constituen­cy with Halma’s Sensit Technologi­es [in which Ms Rathbone owns shares] is a stretch. My comments were about reducing the number of cars on our roads, not trying to clean up the air with additional carbon emissions from a manufactur­er of air cleaning technologi­es.

“It has never occurred to me to link my long standing advocacy of sustainabl­e food with any financial advantage for IMAX, never mind my own declared interest in it.

“My investment in [renewable energy company] Awel Ltd is well below the amount which requires declaratio­n. But I recognize this as one which might be construed as of a potential direct financial interest.

“That is why I have declared that interest under Standing Order 2.6 when discussing renewable energy in the Senedd or in Committee meetings.”

 ?? ?? > Jenny Rathbone
> Jenny Rathbone

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom