Western Morning News (Saturday)
Fire and rescue control centre should stay in Cornwall says council committee
CORNWALL councillors have recommended that the county’s fire and rescue service control centre should remain in Cornwall in the interests of public safety.
Cornwall Council had considered outsourcing the control centre to somewhere else in the UK to try and save money. However, the proposal faced strong opposition from firefighters and councillors, who were concerned that such a move could put lives at risk. As a result, the council went back to the drawing board and drew up a number of different options for the future operation of the service.
Cornwall Fire and Rescue Service currently has a control centre at Tolvaddon, which handles all 999 calls and manages the response by firefighters to calls, but the council said that it needed to consider other options and suggested that it could outsource the service to another fire brigade elsewhere in the country.
After considering the issue, the council’s neighbourhoods overview and scrutiny committee unanimously agreed to recommend to the council’s cabinet that it should consider an option which would see the service retained in Cornwall. While it was warned that this would cost more to provide, councillors said that the extra cost would be worth it.
The committee had been looking at the different options over the last six months, which involved them speaking to those who work in the fire and rescue service as well as visiting fire services outside Cornwall to see how they operate.
Three options had been tabled for the committee to consider – the first would have seen the Tolvaddon centre close and the service outsourced. However, councillors said that there had been no expressions of interest to take this forward.
The second option was to retain the call centre operations during the day but then switch to another fire service overnight. Councillors dismissed this option as they did not consider it would be in the interests of people in Cornwall to have the service provided outside of the Duchy and there were concerns about the loss of local knowledge.
The third option, preferred amongst councillors, was to retain the service in its entirety in Cornwall.
Councillor Jim McKenna, who proposed the option for recommendation to cabinet, said: “It retains the service 24/7 in Cornwall. If we have anything else we would be dismantling part of the service being provided.”
The independent councillor highlighted that there was a need to retain the service in Cornwall due to the increased risk which occurs in the summer and he said that there was no real difference between calls being received during the day or night.”
Barry Jordan said he agreed with Cllr McKenna and added: “The fire service is a critical service, it has to be funded and it has to be run properly. We have to support the fire service 100% and option 2b [the preferred option] is the best way we can do it.” Sophie Hosking, strategic director for neighbourhoods, warned councillors that their preferred option could cost almost £500,000 more a year to provide and said that there was no allocation for this in the budget. She said that she would have to try and find that money from within the fire and rescue service budget or it would have to come from the council’s wider budget.
Cllr McKenna said that with the council having an overall budget of around £1.4billion and a net revenue budget of £700m, the additional cost “in terms of scale it is almost infinitesimally small really”. He added: “In the scale of things it is absolutely minute but the impact is very, very significant indeed.”
The cross party committee voted unanimously in favour of recommending option 2b to the council’s cabinet which would mean the service would continue to be provided within Cornwall.
The cabinet is set to consider the recommendation when it meets on March 22 and will make the final decision on the future provision of the control centre.