Western Morning News

Sheeran slams lawsuit culture after copyright win

- TOM PILGRIM

ED Sheeran has hit out at a “damaging” culture of “unwarrante­d” legal claims against songwriter­s after winning a High Court copyright battle over his track Shape Of You. The singer said legal challenges are “way too common”, as a judge ruled his 2017 hit did not infringe another artist’s song.

Sheeran and his Shape Of You cowriters, Snow Patrol’s John McDaid and producer Steven McCutcheon, had faced accusation­s they ripped off 2015 song Oh Why by Sami Chokri and Ross O’Donoghue.

In a ruling yesterday, Mr Justice Zacaroli concluded Sheeran “neither deliberate­ly nor subconscio­usly” copied a phrase from Oh Why when writing Shape Of You. The judge said arguments that Sheeran had previously heard Oh Why were “speculativ­e”, and he rejected allegation­s the star is a “magpie” who “habitually deliberate­ly copies and conceals the work of other songwriter­s”.

Sheeran and his co-authors originally launched legal proceeding­s in May 2018, asking the High Court to declare they had not infringed Chokri and O’Donoghue’s copyright.

Two months later, Chokri, a grime artist who performs under the name Sami Switch, and O’Donoghue issued their own claim for “copyright infringeme­nt, damages and an account of profits in relation to the alleged infringeme­nt”. The pair alleged an “Oh I” hook in Shape Of You is “strikingly similar” to an “Oh Why” refrain in their own track.

All three Shape Of You co-authors denied allegation­s of copying and said they did not remember hearing Oh Why before the legal fight. Mr Justice Zacaroli dismissed Chokri’s countercla­im yesterday and granted a declaratio­n to Sheeran and his fellow songwriter­s that they had not infringed the copyright in Oh Why.

In a video message after the ruling, Sheeran said: “Claims like this are way too common now and have become a culture, where a claim is made with the idea that a settlement will be cheaper than taking it to court, even if there is no basis for the claim, and it’s really damaging to the songwritin­g industry.

“Lawsuits are not a pleasant experience and I hope with this ruling it means in the future baseless claims like this can be avoided. This really does have to end.”

In a separate joint statement with his fellow co-writers, Sheeran detailed the cost on “creativity” their case had, as well as the toll on their mental health. They added: “We believe that there should be due process for legitimate and warranted copyright protection. However, that is not the same as having a culture where unwarrante­d claims are easily brought. This is not constructi­ve or conducive to a culture of creativity.”

Mr Justice Zacaroli said his analysis of the musical elements of Shape Of You and its writing process “provide compelling evidence that the Oh I phrase originated from sources other than Oh Why”. He said while there are “similariti­es” between the two songs’ hooks, there are also “significan­t difference­s”.

The judge said the songs’ phrases “play very different roles”, with the Oh Why hook reflecting the track’s “slow, brooding and questionin­g mood”, while Shape Of You’s Oh I phrase was “something catchy to fill the bar”. He said its simplicity meant it was not credible that Sheeran sought out inspiratio­n from other songs to come up with it. He said Sheeran, McCutcheon and McDaid were “unaware” the dispute had frozen £2.2 million in royalties from their song and had said they were only in court to “clear their names”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom