What Hi-Fi (UK)

Philips 40PF T6550 £500

FOR Picture sharpness and detail; ambilight AGAINST Colours lack subtlety; horrible menus

-

Philips hasn’t had a very good run of late. Its past couple of TVS have been serviceabl­e, but nothing special – not enough to give the very best a proper challenge. And unfortunat­ely its latest effort, the 40PFT6550 seems to be providing more of the same. It’s a case of close, but not quite.

Running on Android

This 40in, Full HD LED TV sits in the middle of the Philips range. It comes packed with a good amount of tech and supports active 3D, although no glasses are provided. As with every Philips TV we’ve seen this year, it runs on Google’s Android TV platform.

Around the back you’ll find four HDMI inputs and three USB ports – generous. It also has Philips’ lovely Ambilight technology on three sides (left, right, top), with strips of LEDS projecting light on your wall. Ambilight is as dynamic as you want it to be – you could have a solid, non-moving colour, or the lights will react to whatever is on screen. It has the effect of expanding the image to your peripheral vision, creating the illusion that your TV image is a lot bigger. It is designed to decrease eye fatigue and increase the feeling of immersion. And we really like it.

“We like the textures offered, which are sharp and without exaggerati­on. The backlight is encouragin­gly uniform, and we like the contrast”

Data inputting made simple

Another Philips trademark is the two-sided remote control, normal on one side but with a full QWERTY keyboard on the other. It speeds up the laborious task of entering email addresses and passwords.

Sadly, the time saved there is wasted all over again in the menu system, which is just plain annoying. It takes 15 clicks just to get to adjust the brightness. You’ll need to dive in deep, as it’s hidden under layers of sub-menus.

Of course, you’ll likely do this just the once and forget about it, but it’s a longstandi­ng problem and we cannot believe Philips has let it go on for years. The TV is sluggish, too, with some button presses taking seconds to have an effect.

Thankfully, the picture makes up for the system performanc­e to a degree. We like the textures offered, which are sharp without exaggerati­on – this is definitely sharper and more subtle than the Finlux 43UT3E310B%T. The backlight is encouragin­gly uniform.

We like the level of contrast, which demonstrat­es a fine ability to juggle bright and dark – although we’d like the blacks to go a little deeper. At both extremes there is a good deal of detail, although the blacks tend to betray a bit of noise.

The Panasonic TX%50CS520 achieves deeper, cleaner blacks with ease. It also has more accurate colours that make the Philips look a little green, even with some adjustment.

Set motion to minimum

Motion handling is acceptable. Turn off all motion processing and the Philips struggles with slow, smooth pans – this can be fixed with motion processing set to minimum, but we feel even this looks unnatural and overproces­sed. Sadly, there is no compromise.

As for smart content, Google’s Android TV has much potential but is a little sparse for now. You get Google Play plus Netflix, Youtube and BBC iplayer. We’d like more, however.

This is a decent effort. But there are things that need improving, such as the picture and the interface, which face tough competitio­n. Until then, we’ll file this under ‘decent’.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom