Windsor & Eton Express

Deadline missed to rule on mast

Windsor: Developers have consent for 15m phone mast

- By Adrian Williams adrianw@baylismedi­a.co.uk @AdrianW_BM

Windsor residents have raised concerns over a planning applicatio­n which was automatica­lly approved because it passed the statutory time-limit for decisions.

The applicatio­n is for a 15m phone mast on a small plot of land – an open grass verge by a public footpath on Ruddlesway, Windsor, opposite Windsor Gospel Hall.

More than 30 objections were logged, principall­y claiming the mast would be out of place.

It is 3m shorter than a design previously refused planning approval. Officers wrote that it would be ‘unduly prominent and obtrusive in the street scene … and be detrimenta­l of the open character and appearance of this local green space.’

But the current applicatio­n will go ahead due to an error on the Borough’s part.

Any local planning authority (LPA) has 56 days to issue a decision on an applicatio­n. If none has been made before this point, the applicant can carry out works under ‘deemed consent’.

In this instance, the Borough failed to issue a decision within the time limit. Officers wrote in a report: “The LPA are now unable to withhold consent for the works under concerns and objections raised within this report.

“(But) in the interests of transparen­t decision making, it is in the public interest to consider the applicatio­n and determine, had the LPA been able to issue a decision within the timeframe, what conclusion would have been reached.”

Windsor and Eton Society, West Windsor Residents Associatio­n (WWRA) Windsor Neighbourh­ood Plan Group and communitie­s from Bray all raised objections.

The report acknowledg­es these, and that the council’s own tree officer and highways team both raised concerns about the height of the pole. However, the officer(s) wrote:

“In this applicatio­n before us, there is no evidence that a more suitable alternativ­e could be considered without disrupting the capacity of the network.”

Speaking to the Express, Richard Endacott, chair of WWRA, said he feels that the number of objections shows the public interest in officers making a decision on this particular applicatio­n.

He said the proposed developmen­t ‘rides roughshod’ over the Windsor Neighbourh­ood Plan, agreed earlier this year, which protected this space and others like it.

“This is only a small plot, but it sets a bad precedent,” he said. “There are 60 such plots in Windsor, and my concern is that the other 59 could be under threat by developers.

“Altogether, these asset sales could be a cash cow for the Borough to fill a financial black hole,” he added.

“(The council) should launch an investigat­ion to determine if this has happened through negligence, incompeten­ce, or if there’s a more cynical reason.”

A council spokespers­on said: “Unfortunat­ely, the council did not issue a decision by the deadline because of an error and is taking steps to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

“In the interests of transparen­cy, the applicatio­n was still considered and, while taking note of the public comments, we did not consider there would have been planning grounds to refuse the prior approval for the siting and appearance of the proposed developmen­t.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom