Wokingham Today

Are they really providing facilities for all?

- J C White, Wokingham Cllr Gary Cowan, Independen­t Borough Councillor for Arborfield at Wokingham Borough Council The Ghost of Christmas Present, On behalf of: The Ebenezer was a Good Gentlemen Party

There is a certain irony in the headline "Providing facilities for all" which appeared above an article from Wokingham Borough Council's lead on Leisure in last week's

This council has just built a multistore­y car park at Carnival Place having heavy manual doors which cannot be used by anyone in a wheelchair or with weak muscles.

They will not install a push panel to operate the doors, as “this would be vandalised”, a statement made to me when I rang the Council about this issue.

Furthermor­e, Wokingham Library is to be relocated to a new building which will have no disabled parking spaces immediatel­y outside.

At present the nearest disabled parking will be in the multi-storey car park mentioned above. Even if a disabled library user can get the doors open, the distance to the library entrance is further than many disabled people can walk, especially when burdened with heavy books. However, according to statements from Wokingham Borough Council reported in your paper, this is acceptable because benches are provided for people to have a rest partway, in rain, blistering heat, strong wind, bitter cold, or any of the other vagaries of our weather.

Facilities for all? I think not.

The nasty party

Cllr David Chopping’s letter in

last week made very interestin­g reading. David is one of the councillor­s whom I have the greatest respect for as he is one of the most dedicated and hard working councillor­s I know. He is a credit to Wokingham Borough Council.

What a shame he allows the NASTY party DNA to come to the fore when in an attempt to defend the indefensib­le he puts the boot into every Borough Councillor in Wokingham Borough who are not part of the nasty Tory Party.

What he fails to say is he belongs to a Conservati­ve Party with a massive majority that rules in secrecy and uses threatenin­g bully boy tactics backed up by the three line whip to bash all their back benchers into line as history clearly shows.

When the opposition try to hold them to account and they have no defence they just put the boot with personal attacks. Sadly they know of no other way to behave when in very simple terms all they had to do to right the wrong and atone their past errors on Councillor­s pay and allowances was to support the motion submitted by the Lib Dems designed to ensure Councillor­s only got one extra allowance payment but they voted it down.

What this means is the Leader of the council and her “chosen few” can exercise huge patronage and so keep

their snouts in the trough by the retention of a system of Councillor pay that is not open or transparen­t.

The Conservati­ves also miss that point that no matter who gets what it’s you the council taxpayer who pays.

The Prime Minister wants business to be open and transparen­t in its wage structure and all the other Berkshire Councils only pay one allowance per member but Wokingham's Conservati­ves prefer to do the complete opposite by keeping it secret and retaining a system that secretly just looks after themselves.

Parliament operates a system where MP’s pay is not the subject of debate as it is fully independen­t and accepted by all. Wokingham Conservati­ves prefer a system where they can overrule the Independen­t Remunerati­on Panel (IRP) recommenda­tions, as they always do which kills their independen­ce. Perhaps this explains why the panel have all resigned twice in the last five years. I wonder how long this IRP will last when whatever they recommend the Conservati­ves will just overrule them.

As for David putting the boot into me I would add that all monies I get

from the council is fully declared and listed on the council’s website. How many Conservati­ves can honestly say the same.

Sadly the NASTY Conservati­ve party is still alive and well and living in Wokingham Borough. Roll on next May. I very rarely feel sufficient­ly vexed to put quill to vellum to write to the public prints. However, your normally excellent publicatio­n, has in recent weeks driven me into such a state of choleric indisposit­ion that I feel have no alternativ­e but to write to you and complain in the most uncertain terms.

I refer of course to the suggestion that Wokingham Borough Council’s attitude to Christmas at Hare Hatch Sheeplands is like that of a bunch of miserable Scrooges.

This attempt to blacken the reputation of a well-loved and important institutio­n, especially at this Christmas Season, is quite intolerabl­e and must cease immediatel­y!

The institutio­n to which I refer, is of course the late great Mr Ebenezer Scrooge.

The tales of the celebratio­ns of his wake are still legendary.

Mr Scrooge left this life a muchloved public benefactor, celebrated as someone who possessed the good grace to admit to the error of ways and also be open to the popular mood.

I am sure that were Mr Scrooge alive today he would be attempting, possibly with supernatur­al assistance, to take over as head of WBC.

I think his platform would be sound finances, peace and goodwill to all humans, especially at Christmas time and a helping hand to the less fortunate.

I Remain Sincerely Yours, I followed the Sheeplands story with interest.

Nobody, without hidden agenda, could want to prevent a popular garden centre from selling

Christmas trees! If a Council deliberate­ly victimises anyone, it can be

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom