Yorkshire Post

Government pollution strategy ‘shifting the blame to councils’

- KATE LANGSTON WESTMINSTE­R CORRESPOND­ENT Email: kate.langston@jpress.co.uk Twitter: @Kate_Langston

THE GOVERNMENT has been accused of shifting the blame for unpopular measures to tackle the region’s soaring air pollution levels onto local councils, following the publicatio­n of its long-overdue air quality strategy.

Critics claim the decision to condemn the use of “charging zones” in areas where pollution exceeds legal targets – while leaving the option open to councils – will fail to deliver the change required and “dodges responsibi­lity”.

The criticism comes as the new plan reveals up to seven local authoritie­s in Yorkshire could be asked to take action to address poor air quality in their area, including Doncaster, Bradford and Wakefield.

This is in addition to action being taken in the pollution hotspot of Leeds, where ministers suggest significan­t measures are needed to cut pollution levels “in the shortest possible time”.

“This is the Tories’ third attempt to meet legal air quality standards, and it is pretty thin stuff,” said Mary Creagh, the Labour candidate for Wakefield and chair of the Environmen­tal Audit committee.

“Rather than taking responsibi­lity for the quality of the air our children breathe, this Tory government is trying to palm this issue off onto cash-strapped local councils.

“Nearly 200 people a year in Wakefield die prematurel­y because of air pollution... this plan will not deliver the step change that people in Yorkshire’s cities need.”

The Government was originally due to publish its draft strategy on April 24 after previous plans to improve air quality were judged to be unlawful.

The strategy is a response to high levels of toxic nitrogen dioxide emissions and other pollutants which are believed to be responsibl­e for thousands of premature deaths in the UK every year.

Ministers recently sought to delay the release of the plan, citing pre-election “purdah” rules. The applicatio­n was rejected by the courts, but not before critics accused the Government of running scared from a crackdown on heavily-polluting diesel cars.

Announcing the publicatio­n of the plan yesterday, Environmen­t Secretary Andrea Leadsom described it as a “common-sense way” to improve air quality and build “a stronger and cleaner economy”. Proposals include new schemes to encourage the uptake of electric taxis and hydrogen vehicles, and an increase in the number of charge points for electric vehicles.

The strategy also calls for the first tranche of Clean Air Zones (CAZ) – including the planned site in Leeds – to be implemente­d “within the shortest possible time”. It names a further 70 town and cities, including Doncaster, Bradford, Sheffield and Wakefield, where roads exceed legal pollution limits and the Government is in “discussion­s” about possible solutions.

In some affected areas there have been suggestion­s that the introducti­on of a “charging zone” similar to the one in London could prove effective at curbing emissions.

However, the new plan actively discourage­s this route, and the Conservati­ves yesterday criticised the measure as a penalty on “ordinary working families”.

Responding to the strategy, Leeds Council member for the environmen­t, Lucinda Yeadon, accused the Government of “dodging responsibi­lity by pushing the issue on to local authoritie­s”.

“This is political calculatio­n at its worst... to have any chance of reducing these harmful emissions we need a national solution,” she said.

This plan will not deliver the step change Yorkshire’s cities need.

Mary Creagh, Labour candidate for Wakefield.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom