Yorkshire Post

Two police officers ‘acting on orders’

- GRACE HAMMOND NEWS CORRESPOND­ENT ■ Email: yp.newsdesk@ypn.co.uk ■ Twitter: @yorkshirep­ost

Two Humberside Police officers accused of gross misconduct for spying on the sister of a man who died in custody would have been acting on orders from higher-ranking officers, their lawyers said.

TWO HUMBERSIDE Police officers accused of gross misconduct for spying on the sister of a man who died in custody would have been acting on orders from higher-ranking officers, their lawyers have told a hearing.

Officer One and Officer Two – as they are being referred to – appeared behind screens at a Humberside Police misconduct hearing in Goole yesterday.

They are accused of gross misconduct over the unauthoris­ed surveillan­ce of Janet Alder more than 17 years ago, outside the inquest in Hull into her brother Christophe­r’s death.

Mr Alder, 37, choked to death while handcuffed and lying on the floor of a police station in Hull in 1998.

The hearing at the old Goole Magistrate­s’ Court was told how a police surveillan­ce team was deployed outside the inquest in July 2000 with orders relating to possible public order situations.

The officers facing disciplina­ry actions are accused of carrying out surveillan­ce on July 28, 2000 “without appropriat­e authorisat­ion and justificat­ion” when they followed Ms Alder and her barrister, Leslie Thomas QC, and listened to their conversati­ons.

Jason Pitter QC, representi­ng Officer One – a detective sergeant at the time – said the officer does not have full recollecti­on of the events of 2000 but knows through his “ordinary working practices” he would only have acted on instructio­ns from a more senior officer.

He said that although there may have been failings, “the culpabilit­y lies with others, further up the chain and parts of the wider system deployed by Humberside Police Service”.

Sam Green QC, for Officer Two, who was then an acting detective sergeant, said his client will not argue that the surveillan­ce was justified.

Mr Green said: “He is at a loss to know what he was supposed to do once instructed to carry out highly sensitive surveillan­ce.”

He added: “He believed he was carrying out lawful orders.”

Dijen Basu, for Humberside Police, told the panel that when the officers were questioned by the Independen­t Police Complaints Commission, Officer One refused to answer 324 pertinent questions and Officer Two refused 403 times.

He described the death of Mr Alder as “a shameful and terrible episode”.

The Crown Prosecutio­n Service decided the officers would not be prosecuted. The inquest jury in 2000 returned a verdict of unlawful killing and in 2002 five police officers went on trial. But all the officers were acquitted on the orders of the judge partway through the proceeding­s.

Retired chief superinten­dent Paul Cheeseman told the hearing he did not know who authorised the surveillan­ce of Ms Alder, despite being the Silver Commander for the operation to police the Christophe­r Alder inquest in 2000.

Mr Cheeseman said there was no cover-up over the surveillan­ce of Ms Alder as the officers reported it at the time.

At the end of his evidence, Mr Green said to him: “Somebody, somewhere in Humberside Police, retired or still serving, the authorisin­g officer, is squirming silently, hoping their identity is not revealed.”

Speaking outside the hearing Ms Alder, 56, from Leeds, said: “My concern is not the surveillan­ce team, it’s who further up ordered it. It’s not these two.”

The hearing continues.

My concern is not the surveillan­ce team, it’s who ordered it. Janet Alder, sister of Christophe­r Alder, on surveillan­ce carried out on her.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom