Yorkshire Post

Trump defends CIA nominee linked to waterboard­ing

-

DONALD TRUMP has defended his nominee to head the CIA, dismissing debate over her involvemen­t in a “harsh interrogat­ion programme”, widely seen as torture by critics, and arguing Democrats want her out because she “is too tough on terror”.

The president said on Twitter that Gina Haspel has “come under fire because she was too tough on Terrorists”.

He added: “In these very dangerous times, we have the most qualified person, a woman, who Democrats want OUT because she is too tough on terror. Win Gina!”

Ms Haspel offered to withdraw her nomination amid concerns that a debate over the interrogat­ion programme would tarnish her reputation and that of the CIA.

White House aides on Friday sought out additional details about her involvemen­t in the CIA’s now-defunct programme of detaining and brutally interrogat­ing terror suspects after 9/11 as they prepared her for Wednesday’s confirmati­on hearing.

They said Ms Haspel, who is the acting director of the CIA, was reassured that her nomination was still on track and will not withdraw.

Ms Haspel, who would be the first woman to lead the CIA, is the first career operations officer to be nominated to lead the agency in decades. She served almost entirely undercover and much of her record is classified.

Democrats say she should be disqualifi­ed because she was the chief of base at a covert detention site in Thailand where two terrorism suspects were subjected to waterboard­ing, a technique that simulates drowning.

She has told legislator­s in recent weeks that she would stand firm against any effort to restart the brutal detention and interrogat­ion programme, administra­tion officials said. She is expected to reiterate that publicly this week.

Ms Haspel, one official said, was wary of suffering the same fate as failed veterans affairs nominee Ronny Jackson and of dredging up the CIA’s troubled past.

 ??  ?? Said Gina Haspel was being criticised for being too tough on terror.
Said Gina Haspel was being criticised for being too tough on terror.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom