Yorkshire Post

Fracking test well drill plans rejected

Applicatio­n turned down for second time

- PAUL WHITEHOUSE LOCAL DEMOCRACY CORRESPOND­ENT Email: yp.newsdesk@ypn.co.uk Twitter: @yorkshirep­ost

ENERGY: Councillor­s have thrown out a controvers­ial planning applicatio­n that could have paved the way for fracking in the Rotherham district.

Energy firm Ineos had plans to drill a test well in the district rejected earlier this year, but returned with a fresh applicatio­n addressing concerns.

COUNCILLOR­S HAVE thrown out a controvers­ial planning applicatio­n that could have paved the way for fracking in the Rotherham district.

Energy firm Ineos had plans to drill a test well in the district rejected earlier this year, but returned with a fresh applicatio­n addressing concerns.

It was seeking permission to drill a vertical “coring” well at a site near woodland off Dinnington Road, Woodsetts.

The latest refusal came after the company took a similar applicatio­n for a well in the village of Harthill, close to the border with Derbyshire, to appeal successful­ly, as councillor­s were told that national guidance had been changed by the Government to now favour shale gas extraction.

The decision yesterday by members of Rotherham Council was met with cheers from the public gallery.

Councillor­s cited the proximity of the site to homes, safety surroundin­g highways issues and ecological concerns as reasons to reject the applicatio­n.

Following the meeting, a spokeswoma­n for the Woodsetts Against Fracking (WAF) group said: “We are elated by Friday’s decision and grateful to those councillor­s who were able to identify the genuine planning problems associated with this applicatio­n.”

They said they “fully expect Ineos to appeal the decision.

The spokeswoma­n added: “The people of Woodsetts, Rotherham borough and our neighbouri­ng areas which are also under threat, have shown that fracking operations are not welcome here or anywhere and we will continue to fight until we defeat this repugnant industry once and for all.”

The plans did not allow for fracking, but for the sinking of a test well.

That would have meant experts could establish whether there was shale gas in the area to an extent where it could be released, the meeting was told.

Councillor­s defied the recommenda­tions of planning officers during the decision, who said the plans should be approved.

The meeting heard from a range of objectors, including the WAF, residents, a ward councillor and the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England.

Resident Matthew Wilkinson spoke about the health implicatio­n for children at the school on emissions which would be generated from the site with some, he said, being harmful to humans.

“This site will pour tonnes of toxic gasses all over these children’s playground,” he said, telling councillor­s the situation was “a mass child safeguardi­ng issue”.

However, Coun Bob Walsh said he saw no basis in planning law for turning down the applicatio­n, but accepted it would not be popular with residents.

The root of objections was with Government policy on mineral extraction and energy provision, which should be addressed through Parliament, he said.

Coun John Williams also said he had concerns about issues raised by objectors, but that he would vote for the applicatio­n because rules couldn’t justify refusal.

We are elated by Friday’s decision...and grateful to those councillor­s Woodsetts Against Fracking group.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom