Yorkshire Post

Online shoppers ‘misled’ by reviews

- DAVID BEHRENS COUNTY CORRESPOND­ENT ■ Email: david.behrens@ypn.co.uk ■ Twitter: @yorkshirep­ost

Online shoppers are being misled by unscrupulo­us sellers using fake and paid-for product reviews.

Retailers are easily able to bypass rules on product placement by distributi­ng free samples in exchange for positive reviews on sites like Amazon, the consumer group Which? has alleged after an investigat­ion.

ONLINE SHOPPERS are being misled by unscrupulo­us sellers using fake and paid-for product reviews, an undercover investigat­ion has found.

Retailers are easily able to bypass rules on product placement by distributi­ng free samples in exchange for positive reviews on sites like Amazon, it is alleged.

The consumer group Which? said some sellers offered fees, in addition to the products, to a pool of more than 87,000 reviewers in a single Facebook group alone.

Investigat­ors posing as shoppers said they were quickly accepted into “rewards for reviews” groups and were given instructio­ns on how to request free items in return for five-star reviews.

In two cases, the investigat­ors were told by the seller to rewrite their reviews because they were not sufficient­ly positive.

Which? said the sellers were “ripping off ” buyers by encouragin­g reviews that were not impartial.

Among the items for which reviews were solicited was a pair of wireless Bluetooth headphones, whose seller promised that a “refund will be done after a good five-star review with some photo” was received, and instructed the buyer to wait four to five days after receiving the product, before writing a review.

The investigat­or posted a three-star review but was refused a refund unless the review was upgraded to five stars.

In the case of a smart watch, the buyer was instructed to post a review “preferably including pictures and videos”. The investigat­or gave the watch only two stars and was then told to write a better review – with the seller adding that because the product was free it was “the default to give five-star evaluation”.

The seller of a blood pressure monitor, who also promised a refund, could not be contacted after the sale.

Alex Neill, managing director of home products and services at Which?, said the reviews “don’t represent an honest and impar- tial opinion, but instead mislead people into buying products that they might have otherwise avoided.”

Amazon said it did not allow reviews in exchange for compensati­on, and Facebook said that “facilitati­ng or encouragin­g the trade of fake user reviews” was not permitted. However, Which? said it found evidence of Facebook groups with tens of thousands of members.

Mr Neill said: “We all like to do research before buying something. Watch out for unscrupulo­us sellers and use independen­t review sites to make sure you’re getting the products you want.”

They mislead people into buying products they might otherwise avoid. Alex Neill, managing director of home products and services at Which?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom