Yorkshire Post

Two rail firms named as slowest to pay compensati­on over delays

- ALEXANDRA WOOD NEWS CORRESPOND­ENT ■ Email: alex.wood@jpimedia.co.uk ■ Twitter: @yorkshirep­ost

TWO RAIL operators in Yorkshire have been named as the slowest at dealing with compensati­on claims, following widespread disruption experience­d by their passengers last year.

Hull Trains and TransPenni­ne Express – both owned by FirstGroup – took the longest to process their share of three million claims following rail delays between last April and mid-October.

Hull Trains met the one month target to process applicatio­ns in only 32 per cent of cases, while TpE met the target in 46 per cent of the cases, according to the regulator, the Office of Rail and Road.

In contrast, Govia Thameslink Railway, which received one million claims over the period, more than any other company, was one of 10 operators to achieve a score of 100 per cent.

The large number of claims was partly due to the chaotic implementa­tion of new timetables in May, which resulted in severe disruption for several weeks, while Hull Trains had repeated problems with its fleet of four trains, leading to numerous cancellati­ons.

Leeds council leader Judith Blake, who leads on transport for the West Yorkshire Combined Authority, said: “Given the disruption to services in recent months, it is no surprise passenger claims have risen sharply but it is deeply disappoint­ing that for so many people cancellati­ons and delays have been compounded by a protracted compensati­on process. We need to create a rail system which puts passengers first and that is what my review with the Rail Minister will address.”

Anthony Smith, chief executive of passenger watchdog Transport Focus, said in the majority of cases – 92 per cent – operators are “promptly dealing with claims” and it was “disappoint­ing to see some dragging their heels”.

He said operators needed to take action to ensure claims were dealt with within 20 working days, and more automated compensati­on for delays and cancellati­ons should be brought in.

The amount of compensati­on paid varies between train companies and depends on the length of delay and the type of ticket held.

Separate ORR figures show 33 complaints were made per 100,000 journeys between July and September, up 16 per cent year on year. Punctualit­y and reliabilit­y remains the most common cause of complaints, although the overall increase was driven by a rise in frustratio­n over train quality.

Robert Nisbet, of industry body the Rail Delivery Group, said: “We know that services on some routes weren’t good enough last summer due to disruption from the May timetable change and the heatwave the country experience­d. We want to make it simple and easy for customers to claim compensati­on if they’ve experience­d a delay, and some train companies have introduced automatic refunds, helping claims to increase by 80 per cent over the last two years. As well as Delay Repay compensati­on, the industry has paid out additional compensati­on, worth up to a month’s free travel, for those on routes most affected by the timetable change.”

TransPenni­ne Express apologised for “some processing issues” with claims last year and said they would be introducin­g improvemen­ts, including automatic Delay Repay, where certain customers get compensati­on automatica­lly instead of having to fill a form in to apply.

Hull Trains also apologised for the delays, but insisted the situation was improving and they expected to be “back within our customer charter target in the coming weeks”.

We need to create a rail system which puts passengers first. Coun Judith Blake leads on transport for WYCA.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom