Yorkshire Post

Remainer arguments under fire

-

From: William Rees, Boroughbri­dge.

I WOULD have hoped for a more coherent rationale from Gina Miller in her article (The Yorkshire Post, March 8) which tries to persuade us that Brexit is a terrible mistake.

Ms Miller seeks to do this by making derogatory and personal comments about a number of prominent Brexit supporters, particular­ly Nigel Farage, which quoting dubious statistics about what “could” happen in the event of Brexit actually being implemente­d.

And her analysis, such as it is, seems faulty, describing the EU as the “greatest and most successful socialist project of all time,” while claiming that its size allows it to stand up to various “global giants”.

The fact is that the global hitech companies are only too delighted to deal with the EU, because they are able to shore up their own monopolist­ic trading practices with regulation­s that protect their interests.

The EU’s “four freedoms” simply funnel economic growth and prosperity into a small number of industrial and commercial centres while leaving the rest of Europe behind, although they do throw some crumbs from the table in the form of the regional social funds that she also refers to.

Unfortunat­ely there will be short-term pain if and when we leave the EU, given how the Government has failed to plan adequately for us leaving without a so-called deal.

But let’s remember, when you jump out of a sinking ship, you do get wet. And in the long term it is far better than the alternativ­e.

From: Jon Marcus, Colville Gardens, Lightwater, Surrey.

HOW fortunate we Brits are to have Gina Miller ignoring democracy and doing her best to upset our referendum vote to leave the EU.

The latest example of this is her column in which she attacks Nigel Farage and people like Boris Johnson and Jacob ReesMogg, and says Brexit supporters have not told the populace the advantages of leaving the EU.

I won’t list all the advantages, to save space. The three people above have already explained the advantages many times.

She seems to have a problem with facts and gives a very onesided argument to support her various claims.

If the British were asked to join the EU now, the vote would be overwhelmi­ng against being part of this undemocrat­ic, wasteful, corrupt shambles presided over by unelected, unaccounta­ble, gravy-train riding bureaucrat­s.

We all know the EU is terrified of Britain having a clean break on March 29 because of the billions it would lose and it knows our economy will greatly prosper once we are out of the EU straitjack­et. From: Barrie Crowther, Walton, Wakefield.

REMAINERS like Gina Miller cannot seem to grasp that European Social Fund money sent to Britain originates from British contributi­ons originally sent to Brussels. So in effect we are recycling our own money. Not only that, but for every £2 paid in we receive approximat­ely £1 back – according to Nigel Lawson, a former Chancellor. Good business practice?

From: Eddie Peart, Broom Crescent, Rotherham.

THE article written by Gina Miller does not mention the referendum result. I wonder why? Perhaps we should ignore the result of the next general election and place the unelected Michel Barnier and his crew in positions of power?

 ?? PICTURE: JAMES HARDISTY ?? GINA MILLER: leaving the EU. Made case against
PICTURE: JAMES HARDISTY GINA MILLER: leaving the EU. Made case against

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom