Yorkshire Post

Taxpayers hit with £4.4bn bill for Brexit

Auditors reveal the figures and say up to 22,000 staff worked on preparatio­ns

- GERALDINE SCOTT WESTMINSTE­R CORRESPOND­ENT ■ Email: geraldine.scott@jpimedia.co.uk ■ Twitter: @Geri_E_L_Scott

THE NATION’S exit from the European Union has cost the UK’s taxpayers more than £4bn in additional government costs with 22,000 staff working on preparatio­ns at its peak, according to a report released today.

The National Audit Office (NAO) found that between the EU referendum in June 2016 and March 31 this year, Government department­s will have spent at least £4.4bn, while £6.3bn was allocated by the Treasury for Brexit preparatio­ns.

That included planning for both deal and no deal scenarios, with £2bn specifical­ly earmarked for no deal preparatio­ns in 201920 – although this was scaled back after the prospects of leaving without a deal receded.

Overall, the NAO said the figures represente­d a “minimum estimated level of spend” due to “limitation­s” in the data provided by department­s.

Of the money spent, £1.9bn went on staffing costs, £1.5bn on building new systems and infrastruc­ture, and £288m on bringing in expertise and external advice. At the peak of activity in October 2019, there were 22,000 staff working on Brexit preparatio­ns, including 1,500 employees who had been moved within government to prepare for a possible no deal exit.

The head of the NAO, Gareth Davies, said: “In preparing for EU exit, Government department­s planned for multiple potential outcomes, with shifting timetables and uncertaint­y. Producing this report has highlighte­d limitation­s in how government monitored spending on EU exit specifical­ly, and cross-government programmes more generally.”

The chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, Meg Hillier, added: “At least £4.4bn

was spent, and 22,000 staff worked on EU Exit preparatio­ns.

“The number of senior civil servants is now nine per cent higher than in 2010, with 12 per cent of all senior civil servants working on EU Exit roles.

“The public has been kept in the dark as to what the Government

has been doing. Data is limited, and the Treasury seem unconcerne­d by the lack of transparen­cy.”

The NAO report found that although much funding was allocated specifical­ly from the Treasury, some department­s had to find cash totally £301m from their existing budgets.

The department which spent the most was the Department for Environmen­t, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra), where the bill topped £871m, for work including controllin­g animal and plant product imports and agricultur­e policies.

The Department for Education spent the least, at just £12m, on guaranteei­ng the Erasmus scheme for students studying abroad and student finance for EU nationals.

The report comes as Ministers hailed as “landmark legislatio­n” the Immigratio­n Bill that ends post-Brexit free movement of labour and the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier has warned there were “very serious divergence­s” with the UK following the first round of negotiatio­ns on a postBrexit trade deal.

The Bill, put before Parliament yesterday, is intended to pave the way for the foundation of a pointsbase­d immigratio­n system.

Minister for Future Borders and Immigratio­n Kevin Foster said: “Today we’ve taken the momentous first step to end free movement and take back control of our borders, delivering on the people’s priorities.

“Our firmer and fairer pointsbase­d immigratio­n system will attract the brightest and best from around the globe, prioritisi­ng those who come to Britain based on the skills they have to offer, not on the passport they hold.”

Mr Foster said that if the Bill was passed, it will ensure a points-based immigratio­n system from January 1, 2021.

‘Difficult’ EU talks: Page 4.

 ??  ?? MEG HILLIER: Chairman of Public Accounts Committee said public had been kept in the dark.
MEG HILLIER: Chairman of Public Accounts Committee said public had been kept in the dark.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom