Tory MPs poised to rebel over Huawei decision
Amendment would ban tech giant from network
BORIS JOHNSON is facing the prospect of his first Commons rebellion since the General Election over his decision to allow Huawei a role in building the UK’s 5G network.
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith has tabled an amendment which would ban “high-risk vendors” like the Chinese tech giant from the network after 2022.
The move has the backing of a number of prominent Conservative MPs including former Cabinet Ministers Damian Green and David Davis, the chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Tugendhat and the chairman of the Tory backbench 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady.
Supporters, however, played down the prospect that the Government – which has a Commons majority of 80 – could be defeated if the amendment is called at the report stage of the Telecoms Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill in the Commons on Tuesday.
Instead, Tory backbencher Bob Seely, one of the MPs behind the move, said they were “laying down a marker” ahead of other legislation later in the year to establish a comprehensive telecoms security regime.
He said there was “growing momentum” within the party with “three or four MPs” expressing concern to the whips for every one likely to vote for the amendment next week. “We want to work with the Government, not to defeat it. We want to co-operate with the Government to get a better solution,” he said.
The move reflects misgivings across the Conservative Party at the decision, with fears that it could give China a “backdoor” to spy on the UK’s telecoms network. It has also imposed strains on relations with the United States, with an “apoplectic” Donald Trump reportedly venting his fury during a telephone call with Mr Johnson.
In a Commons Westminster Hall debate on Wednesday, Sir
Iain said the decision had left Britain “friendless” among its Five Eyes security allies.
He compared it to letting “Nazi companies in Germany” to become involved in developing Britain’s radar systems at the start of the Second World War in 1939. He said: “We’re in a mess and the only way to get out of that mess is ... to ensure that Huawei reduces from its present position not to 35 per cent that the Government wants but simply down to 0 per cent.
“I recognise that may take a little bit of time but I say in the next two to three years that should be the purpose of the Government.”
He added: “Can I just simply say, imagine in 1939 had we been we developing our radar systems, we decided actually to have one of the Nazi companies in Germany involved directly in doing it. This is the level. ‘Oh, but we reduced to the 35 per cent of the involvement, so only 35 per cent was controlled by them.’ I wonder how ridiculous that is.”
Both Labour and the SNP, the two largest opposition parties, echoed the concerns, with Shadow Business Minister Chi Onwurah saying they shared a “deep commitment to British security”.
The Government has sought to allay criticism, insisting that Huawei’s involvement would be restricted to providing 35 per cent of the network’s “non-core” elements.
Digital Infrastructure Minister Matt Warman told MPs the Government’s “long-term goal” was to reduce their reliance on high-risk vendors.
However, he said they were currently faced with a “very narrow choice of suppliers” and that any timetable “must be contingent of diversification in the market”.
A Downing Street spokesman said: “We have been clear that our world-leading cyber security experts are satisfied with our approach and it won’t affect our ability to share intelligence.”
We want to cooperate with the Government to get a better solution.
Backbench Conservative MP Bob Seely.