Yorkshire Post

BERNARD INGHAM on Wednesday

- Bernard Ingham

If newspapers disappear, our democracy is undermined. We may not yet have reached George Orwell’s 1984 but let us not kid ourselves: we are faced with unpreceden­ted threats to our blessed freedom.

NEARLY 72 years ago I ceased to deliver newspapers and began learning my trade as a journalist. To get into the Hebden Bridge Times’ office I had to cross a little graveyard for the building was once the Ebenezer Baptist Chapel.

It never occurred to me then that the brave new world I thought I was entering might be a graveyard industry. Now I wonder.

First, the Housing Minister, Robert Jenrick urges us all the buy newspapers and then the Royal Family pay tribute to my trade from national titles to local and regional outlets “making a difference to their communitie­s”.

Meanwhile, the editor of this newspaper, among others, calls for public support through subscripti­ons and advertisin­g as the coronaviru­s strikes another blow against newsprint.

Let’s face it, there is only so much newspapers can take after their hammering over the last 30 years.

The massive growth of radio and television broadcasti­ng stole advertisin­g and weaned many off the newspapers I was brought up to read – even while delivering them.

“Leave some newsprint for us”, my clients used to say.

Then came the computer age stealing ever more advertisin­g and websites encouragin­g people to read their packaged news rather than journals.

Indeed, you might argue there is now a conspiracy against print as we are all, regardless of age, urged to go online. It’s got so bad that you can’t pay printed money into a bank in Hebden Bridge.

They have all upped sticks while newspapers, operating on much tighter purse strings, still try, as the Royal Family recognises, to serve their communitie­s.

All this is bad enough, but the situation is much worse than that.

If newspapers disappear our very democracy is undermined.

For me, radio and television are no substitute for the written word.

From broadcasti­ng you get an impression – and an often prejudiced one these days – whereas from newspapers, however partisan, you can get to grips with informatio­n, study it and make up your own mind.

And the more healthy, profitable competing newspapers we have the better we are informed from parish pump to Parliament.

Some may accuse me of hypocrisy after my turbulent relationsh­ip with the media during my stint as Margaret Thatcher’s Press secretary.

All I can say is that I recognised they – regional and local as well as national press – had a job to do and sought to help them with facts, not invention, conspiracy theory or over-interpreta­tion. We were still on partying terms after 11 years.

Today, as a newspaperm­an to the last, I have not even a passing acquaintan­ce with Facebook, Twitter, etc, but they seem to operate without a newspaper’s constraint­s of libel and pornograph­y laws.

We can’t have one law for the rich and another for the poor.

My purpose now is not to preserve the printed press for the sake of it but to safeguard our freedom in a healthy democracy.

We have had a lucky escape with Jeremy Corbyn now a busted flush.

The hard Left does not believe in freedom but control. Had he ever secured office he would have ruthlessly exploited an impoverish­ed press by threatenin­g boycotts they could not sustain if they did not toe the line. I have some experience of this approach.

Just imagine what effect Big Brother watching us would have on the free flow of informatio­n, ideas and comment.

Meanwhile, Russia and China wage cyber war against the democracie­s with fake news and interferen­ce in elections – a threat systematic­ally investigat­ed and exposed by newspapers.

That – and the internet – is a global threat. Nationally, we are assailed by the likes of Extinction Rebellion, a proliferat­ion of narrow-minded special interest groups and the snowflake generation telling us not just what to think but how.

They also seek to enforce their will, too often with the active support of emptynoddl­ed academics and the police who, under some chief constables, seem more concerned about “hate crime” than chasing real criminals.

We may not yet have reached George Orwell’s 1984 but let us not kid ourselves: we are faced with unpreceden­ted threats to our blessed freedom.

That freedom is best preserved by a strong, vigorous media – and especially by a healthy, profitable Press reaching down from Fleet Street to local weeklies.

As a democrat I long for the Press’s return to health.

As a Yorkshirem­an exiled in the soft south I think all this talk of a Yorkshire region would be pretty meaningles­s without a daily newspaper.

So, support home industry – The Yorkshire Post I first served in 1952.

 ??  ??
 ?? PICTURE: BRUCE ROLLINSON ?? MAKING A DIFFERENCE: Bernard Ingham says his purpose is not to preserve the printed press for the sake of it but to safeguard our freedom.
PICTURE: BRUCE ROLLINSON MAKING A DIFFERENCE: Bernard Ingham says his purpose is not to preserve the printed press for the sake of it but to safeguard our freedom.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom