Warning of division as county pushes plan for ‘ super- council’

THE Local Government Secretary will decide between two contrasting proposals to create unitary authorities in North Yorkshire and York, it has been agreed – despite claims a plan to create a supercouncil is riddled with errors and doomed to be rejected.

North Yorkshire county councillors have overwhelmingly voted in favour of submitting the authority’s plan to retain the county’s boundaries in the biggest shake- up of how public services are provided since 1974.

After a two- hour debate which illustrated how polarised views have become, just 11 of the 68 elected members voted against allowing the Government to consider the scheme for a single council encompassing a population of almost 620,000.

It puts the county council in direct opposition to district and borough councils, which this week voted to submit separate plans to split the county into east and west authorities.

Many councillors said the public consensus was that it was a completely inappropriate time to be reorganising local government, with one likening the action to shuffling deckchairs on a sinking ship.

But the authority’s leader, Coun Carl Les, warned councils were about to face “the biggest financial challenge ever” and the forecast £ 30m of savings that could be realised would be vital to protect services.

He said Secretary of State Robert Jenrick had told him the Government had begun a legal process for creating unitary authorities in North Yorkshire and would not halt it, despite the pandemic.

Coun Les said the county’s proposal would protect high- quality services, minimise disruption and deliver devolution in the shortest possible time.

Dismissing claims that a council based in Northallerton could not hope to understand the needs of residents of the 3,000 sq mile area, he said the county’s proposal put localism above all else, ensuring “local services in local areas delivered by local staff and by local managers in local offices”.

Disputing that claim, Independent group leader Stuart Parsons said the authority’s proposal was riddled with local knowledge errors. He said it featured an “insulting” map, overlooking some market towns and showing ignorance about other settlements.

He added that instead of simplifying local government in the county, it would add confusion, citing the example of how parishes were set to be allowed to decide if they wanted extra powers.

While the vast majority of councillors said they supported creating unitary authorities as it would cut duplication, Labour group leader Eric Broadbent said “Yorkshire people have a sense of belonging” and creating one large authority would be a step too far.

However, Lib Dem group leader Geoff Webber said he believed issues of remoteness across potentially the UK’s second largest local authority area after the Highlands were a thing of the past due to technology improvements.

Ryedale Council leader Keane Duncan said the county’s proposal would create the lowest proportion of elected representatives of any population in England and unleash “distraction and division” between councils.

He said he was confident the Government would reject the scheme, adding: “It promises a revolution in localism, yet stands on a platform of centralising up rather than devolving down.”

Calls were also made for residents to be given a say on the two plans via a referendum, but the meeting was told that the holding of such a vote was in the Government’s power to decide as well.

It stands on a platform of centralising up rather than devolving down. Ryedale Council leader Keane Duncan on North Yorkshire County Council’s proposal.