Yorkshire Post

US election ‘ was most secure in history’

- CHARLES BROWN NEWS REPORTER ■ Email: yp. newsdesk@ ypn. co. uk ■ Twitter: @ yorkshirep­ost

A COALITION of federal and state officials said they have no evidence that votes were compromise­d or altered in last week’s presidenti­al election.

The statement from cyber security experts, which trumpeted the November 3 election as the most secure in American history, amounted to the most direct repudiatio­n to date of President Donald Trump’s efforts to undermine the integrity of the contest with unsubstant­iated claims of widespread fraud.

It echoed repeated assertions by election experts and state officials that the election unfolded smoothlywi­thoutbroad­irregulari­ties.

The statement said: “While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunit­ies for misinforma­tion about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

The statement was distribute­d by the Cybersecur­ity and Infrastruc­ture Security Agency, which spearheade­d federal election protection efforts. Its leaders have been vocal on Twitter in reassuring Americans that the election was secure and that their votes would be counted.

The officials who signed the statement said they had no evidence that any voting system had deleted or changed votes, or was in any way compromise­d. The statement continued: “The No

vember 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalising the result.”

The message is in stark contrast to Mr Trump’s unsupporte­d claims of fraud and widespread problems that he insists could affect vote totals. He has launched a series of legal challenges.

The issues Mr Trump’s campaign and its allies have pointed to are typical in every election: problems with signatures, secrecy envelopes and postmarks on mail- in ballots, as well as the potential for a small number of ballots lost.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom