Akron Beacon Journal

Abortion, marijuana measures passed. Here’s the lesson the GOP should learn.

- Ray Marcano is a long-time journalist with writing and editing experience at some of the country’s largest media brands.

Statehouse Republican­s put up a nasty fight, but at the end of the day, Ohio voters proved just how out of touch they are and have been.

As polls predicted they would, Ohioans enshrined abortion and other reproducti­ve rights into the state constituti­on and approved a measure that will allow those 21 and older to buy, possess and grow cannabis.

The double smack on the nose was a long time coming and well-deserved.

Ohio’s disingenuo­us conservati­ve leaders did everything they could to fight the people’s will.

They held an August election to make passing amendments to the state constituti­on harder by requiring 60% voter approval instead of a simple majority.

It’s always a tough sell to get voters to give up power, especially during a duplicitou­s process.

And boy was the process duplicitou­s.

How Republican­s lawmakers tried to stop the people

For two years, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose and other Republican­s called August elections a waste of money and undemocrat­ic since so few people voted.

They celebrated in January when Gov. Mike DeWine signed House Bill 458 into law. It all but abolished special August election, changed voter ID requiremen­ts and made a slew of other eyebrow raising adjustment­s to a system that was not broken.

But to stymie the abortion amendment, Republican­s changed their tune and spend roughly $20 million in taxpayer’s money to hold an August election.

There’s your waste of money, as August’s Issue 1 lost with 57.1% of people voting no.

Once that vote came in there wasn’t anything conservati­ves could do to derail the march to reproducti­ve freedom.

Public polling consistent­ly showed a majority of voters support a woman’s right to choose, especially given the alternativ­e – the state’s paused “Heartbeat” law.

That law is simply too draconian. Before being paused by a Hamilton County judge, it banned abortions as soon as doctors detected cardiac activity.

Many women often don’t know they’re pregnant by the time medical providers can detect a heartbeat — as little as six weeks.

Scientific American wrote that a ban of about six weeks really means about four weeks from conception and “only one week, realistica­lly, from when a person could find out they are pregnant.”

(While at-home pregnancy test tend to be reliable, Medical experts say it’s best to wait until after a woman has missed one period to get an accurate pregnancy result).

Republican­s wanted all and got nothing

Gov. Mike DeWine, who campaigned against November’s Issue 1, called on lawmakers to make changes in the Heartbeat law so it was more palatable to Ohioans.

But they didn’t. They stuck with an extreme ban that failed.

But this is more than about abortion.

Three strikes with a fourth on the horizon

Republican­s are now zero for three on issues important to their base but run contrary to what the voters at large think.

Ohio’s a red state, but not as red as people think. These votes have shown that.

That should concern Republican­s, who only hold a veto-proof majority because they’ve twice ignored Ohio voters who want fair redistrict­ing. They’ve rigged House and Senate seats in their favor because, as the last three votes have shown, they can’t win on policy. Even Republican­s are telling them that.

Soon, their veto-proof majority will go the way of the Yugo because voters, likely in 2024, will have a chance to take redistrict­ing power away from politician­s and into the hands of an independen­t commission.

That has a good chance of passing because Republican­s can’t defend their gerrymande­ring. Democrats can’t either in states they control.

Abortion is a big issue for conservati­ves, but power is a bigger issue for lawmakers. Voters have now told them, three times in a row, that they reject the positions they fought so hard for.

And that begs one final question: Are they smart enough to listen?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States