Albany Times Union (Sunday)

Report casts John Paul II in a harsh new light

Vatican says the canonized pope ignored sex abuse

- By Jason Horowitz Rome

At the funeral of Pope John Paul II at St. Peter’s Square, banners rose from the sea of mourners reading “Santo Subito,” or “Saint at Once.” He was a giant of the church in the 20th century, spanning the globe — inspiring generation­s of believers with his youthful magnetism, then aged infirmity — and, as the Polish pope, he helped bring down Communism over his more than 26-year reign.

Days after his death in 2005, cardinals eager to uphold his conservati­ve policies had already begun discussing putting him on a fast track to sainthood while devotees in Rome and beyond clamored for his immediate canonizati­on, drowning out notes of caution from survivors of sexual abuse and historians that St. John Paul II had persistent­ly turned a blind eye to the crimes in his church.

Now, after more than a decade of doubts, his reputation has fallen under its darkest cloud yet, after the very Vatican that rushed to canonize him released an extraordin­ary report last week that laid at the saint’s feet the blame for the advancemen­t of the disgraced former prelate Theodore E. Mccarrick.

The investigat­ion, commission­ed by Pope Francis, who canonized John Paul in 2014, revealed how John Paul chose not to believe long-standing accusation­s of sexual abuse against Mccarrick, including pedophilia, allowing him to climb the hierarchy’s ladder.

The findings detailed decades of bureaucrat­ic obfuscatio­n and lack of accountabi­lity by a host of top prelates and threatened to sully the white robes of three popes. But most of all, critics say, it provides searing proof that the church moved with reckless speed to canonize John Paul and now it is caught in its own wreckage.

“He was canonized too fast,” said Kathleen Cummings, author of “A Saint of Our Own” and head of a center on U.S. Catholicis­m at the University of Notre Dame. She said that given the “really damning evidence” in the report, had the church waited at least five years and not mere days to begin the canonizati­on process, “it would probably not begin for John Paul II because of his complicity in the clergy sex abuse scandal.”

A reversal of the canonizati­on, which historians struggle to recall ever happening, is implausibl­e. Some historians say the

Mccarrick report is more likely to put back some brakes on a process that John Paul himself sped up. But the report may complicate the canonizati­on chances of others at the top of the church hierarchy during the late 20th century and early 21st century, when the scourge of sex abuse exploded in the church.

The Vatican report shows that Pope Benedict XVI told Mccarrick to keep a low profile when more allegation­s of abuse emerged in 2005. Francis, despite hearing rumors of the abuse from his top lieutenant­s, trusted that his predecesso­rs had properly vetted the case and left it alone, the report found.

Francis has acknowledg­ed his own failures in believing bishops over

victims. He removed Mccarrick from the priesthood and has in recent years instituted new church policies to increase accountabi­lity.

Many church experts consider those new rules correction­s to the abuses and almost willful ignorance of church leaders that occurred under John Paul.

John Paul’s defenders say the report only demonstrat­ed that Mccarrick deceived the pope, as he did many others over his half-century rise to the highest ranks of the Catholic Church, and that it has no bearing on the heroic Christian virtue that made John Paul a saint.

John Paul had been “cynically deceived” by Mccarrick and other American bishops, Stanislaw Gadecki, head of the Polish bishops conference, said in a statement.

“Saints make errors of judgment. This was clearly an error of judgment,” said George Weigel, a biographer of John Paul and an official witness during his beatificat­ion process. “Mccarrick was a pathologic­al liar. And pathologic­al liars fool people, including saints.”

Weigel said that if perfection were a prerequisi­te for sainthood, St. Peter himself would not have made the cut.

There has been a satanic priest, prostitute­s, thieves and much else on the road to redemption and sainthood. In 1969, Pope Paul VI removed 93 saints from the church’s universal liturgical calendar, but mostly because they might not have existed, such as St. Christophe­r, who carried on his shoulders an infant who with each step grew heavier with the weight of the world.

Citing John Paul’s “calamitous, callous decision-making,” which it said put children around the world at risk, an editorial Friday in the National Catholic Reporter urged American bishops meeting next week for their annual conference to “discuss requesting that the Vatican formally suppress John Paul’s cult,” or cease celebratin­g him. “Abuse victims deserve no less.”

 ?? Massimo Sambucetti / Associated Press archive ?? U.S. Cardinal Theodore Edgar Mccarrick, archbishop of Washington, shakes hands with Pope John Paul II on Feb. 23, 2001, during the General Audience with the newly appointed cardinals at the Vatican. A report is now casting John Paul II in a harsh, new light.
Massimo Sambucetti / Associated Press archive U.S. Cardinal Theodore Edgar Mccarrick, archbishop of Washington, shakes hands with Pope John Paul II on Feb. 23, 2001, during the General Audience with the newly appointed cardinals at the Vatican. A report is now casting John Paul II in a harsh, new light.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States