Albany Times Union

Curb the secrecy

-

The administra­tion of Gov. Andrew Cuomo has a reputation for secrecy, as most who follow state government in Albany already know.

But even by the governor’s opaque standards, the imperious stonewalli­ng around the issue of nursing homes and COVID -19 has been remarkable to watch and troubling to consider. Mr. Cuomo is withholdin­g informatio­n lawmakers and the public have every right to see.

For one, the state Department of Health has refused to release an accurate count of the number of nursing home residents who died of COVID -19. The state’s official tally is a significan­t undercount, certainly, because it does not include residents who were transferre­d to hospitals before they died.

Journalist­s, legislator­s and others have for many months asked for the complete count, to no avail. The state even has rebuffed Freedom of Informatio­n Law requests with shoddy or unpersuasi­ve explanatio­ns for why it won’t release full data.

As the Times Union’s Chris Bragg reported this week, the Health Department also has refused to provide

the informatio­n it used as the basis for a much-disputed report that tried to absolve the state of any blame for COVID -19 nursing home deaths. That report faulted employees for bringing the virus into the facilities, thus clearing of culpabilit­y a controvers­ial gubernator­ial order requiring nursing homes to accept COVID -19 patients.

Some epidemiolo­gists doubt that the underlying data support such a sweeping conclusion, and the state has only strengthen­ed suspicions by refusing to show how it was reached. Indeed, the state's filibuster­ing only feeds and validates speculatio­n that the Cuomo administra­tion is trying to hide something, and that providing a full picture of the state’s nursing home decisions would harm the governor’s reputation.

Unvarnishe­d, realistic assessment­s of policy decisions are key to fighting this and possibly future pandemics.

That’s why the secrecy is beyond irresponsi­ble. Protecting public health is vitally important; protecting Mr. Cuomo’s image and ego is not.

Lawmakers must correct the administra­tion’s behavior. One step would be to resurrect legislatio­n requiring government­s to pay legal fees if a judge finds FOIL has been ignored. Current law allows judges to award legal fees, but doesn’t require them to.

The Legislatur­e passed a similar bill in 2015, only to have a certain secretive governor veto the bill. Now that Democrats have veto-proof majorities in the Senate and Assembly, they should again approve the open-government legislatio­n, and make it law whether Mr. Cuomo likes it or not.

No, the measure wouldn’t prevent every incident of stonewalli­ng. It probably wouldn’t have deterred the actions of a Cuomo administra­tion determined to keep the public in the dark about its handling of nursing homes during the pandemic.

But the law would put ordinary citizens, news organizati­ons and, in fact, anybody seeking informatio­n on a more equal footing with government­s, and it would signal that New York is committed to open and transparen­t government, despite Mr. Cuomo’s actions to the contrary.

 ?? Photo illustrati­on by Jeff Boyer / Times Union ??
Photo illustrati­on by Jeff Boyer / Times Union

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States