Albany Times Union

Much more than a wall

-

If you’re looking for a metaphor for America’s immigratio­n policy, look no further than the disconnect­ed pieces of Donald Trump’s southern border wall — barriers that anyone could just walk right around.

The absurdity. The ineffectiv­eness. The waste of $15 billion and all that national energy that could have gone to dealing with the issue of immigratio­n in an intelligen­t, comprehens­ive way.

America can’t get back the last four years of Mr. Trump’s simplistic pandering, or the decades of dead-end debate that did little more than boost the political fortunes and fatten the campaign coffers of politician­s cynical and opportunis­tic enough to milk this issue for all it’s been worth.

But Congress has the opportunit­y, right now, to finally tackle immigratio­n thoughtful­ly and effectivel­y.

On the table is President Joe Biden’s U.S. Citizenshi­p Act of 2021, which would address immigratio­n from a multitude of angles.

It would increase security, with greater use of technology at ports of entry and along the border, better training of border agents, and more focus on narcotics and human smuggling.

It would provide a path to citizenshi­p — eight years long — for millions of undocument­ed immigrants in this country, including “Dreamers” who were brought here as children.

It would help fund state, local and private programs to promote inclusion and integratio­n, such as Englishlan­guage instructio­n and help for people seeking to become citizens.

It would reverse anti-immigrant federal policy that runs counter to the nation’s interests and seek to grow the U.S. workforce by expanding visas, allowing more flexibilit­y in green card policies to address labor shortages, and making it easier for foreign students who graduate from American universiti­es to remain here. At the same time, it includes provisions to protect U.S. citizens from unfair competitio­n.

It would take a more humane approach than the harsh tactics of the Trump administra­tion that shamed this nation and drew U.N. condemnati­on, with proposals to keep families together, expedite requests for asylum, and develop formal guidelines for treatment of individual­s, families and children in government custody.

And, it would include anti-gang initiative­s and invest $4 billion in the economies of Central American countries to address root causes of the surge in migration — poverty and violence.

We know there are plenty of people and organizati­ons with a vested interest in keeping immigratio­n alive as a divisive political issue, from a rightwing media ecosystem that thrives on appealing to fear and white nationalis­m to politician­s for whom a hardline stance is both a cheap test of ideologica­l purity and fund-raising gold to the thousands who enlisted in Mr. Trump’s anti-immigratio­n hiring spree to the contractor­s who reaped the $15 billion that American taxpayers — not Mexico — were forced to spend on the wall that isn’t a wall. And we know there are people who remember the broken promises of the Reagan era to address both immigratio­n reform and border security.

That was a generation ago. It’s time deal with immigratio­n in the here and now, with an approach that doesn’t stand as one more monument to failure.

 ?? Photo illustrati­on by Jeff Boyer / Times Union ??
Photo illustrati­on by Jeff Boyer / Times Union

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States