Albany Times Union

Pulling troops out

Biden to withdraw all combat troops from Afghanista­n by Sept. 11.

- By Helene Cooper, Thomas Gibbons-neff and Eric Schmitt The New York Times

President Joe Biden will withdraw U.S. combat troops from Afghanista­n by Sept. 11, declaring an end to the nation’s longest war and overruling warnings from his military advisers that the departure could prompt a resurgence of the same terrorist threats that sent hundreds of thousands of troops into combat over the past 20 years.

In rejecting the Pentagon’s push to remain until Afghan security forces can assert themselves against the Taliban, Biden forcibly stamped his views on a policy he has long debated but never controlled. Now, after years of arguing against an extended American military presence in Afghanista­n, the president is doing things his way, with the deadline set for the 20th anniversar­y of the terrorist attacks.

A senior Biden administra­tion official said the president had come to believe that a “conditions-based approach” would mean that U.S. troops would never leave the country. The announceme­nt is expected Wednesday.

Biden’s decision would pull all U.S. troops out of Afghanista­n 20 years after President George W. Bush ordered an invasion after the Sept. 11 attacks on New York City and the Pentagon, with the goal of punishing Osama bin Laden and his followers in al- Qaida, who were sheltered in Afghanista­n by their Taliban hosts.

The war was launched with widespread internatio­nal support — but it became the same long, bloody, unpopular slog that forced the British to withdraw from Afghanista­n in the 19th century and the Soviet Union to retreat in the 20th.

Nearly 2,400 U.S. troops have died in Afghanista­n in a conflict that has cost about $2 trillion.

Biden’s Democratic supporters in Congress praised the withdrawal, even as Republican­s said it would risk American security.

“The U.S. went into Afghanista­n in 2001 to defeat those who attacked the U.S. on 9/11,” Sen. Tim Kaine, D -Va., said in a statement. “It is now time to bring our troops home, maintain humanitari­an and diplomatic support for a partner nation, and refocus American national security on the most pressing challenges we face.”

Jon Soltz, an Iraq War veteran and chairman of the progressiv­e veterans group Votevets, said that “words cannot adequately express how huge this is for troops and military families, who have weathered deployment after deployment, with no end in sight, for the better part of two decades.”

But Biden’s decision drew fire from Republican­s.

“This is a reckless and dangerous decision,” said Sen. James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Arbitrary deadlines would likely put our troops in danger, jeopardize all the progress we’ve made, and lead to civil war in Afghanista­n — and create a breeding ground for internatio­nal terrorists.”

President Donald Trump had set a withdrawal deadline for May 1, but he was known for announcing, and reversing, a number of significan­t foreign policy decisions, and Pentagon officials continued to press for a delay. Biden, who has long been skeptical of the Afghan deployment, spent his first three months in office assessing that timeline.

The Afghan central government is unable to halt Taliban advances, and American officials offer a grim assessment of prospects for peace in the country. Still, American intelligen­ce agencies say they do not believe al- Qaida or other terrorist groups pose an immediate threat to strike the U.S. from Afghanista­n. That assessment has been critical to the Biden administra­tion as it decided to withdraw most of the remaining forces from the country.

A senior administra­tion official said the troop withdrawal would begin before May 1 and conclude before the symbolic date of Sept. 11. Any attacks on withdrawin­g NATO troops, the official said, would be met with a forceful response.

Taliban leaders have long pledged that any breach of the deadline means that their forces will again attack U.S. and coalition troops. Under a withdrawal deal negotiated during the Trump administra­tion, the Taliban mostly stopped those attacks — but in past weeks, they have rocketed U.S. bases in Afghanista­n’s south and east.

In public statements Tuesday, Taliban leaders focused not on Biden’s decision for a full withdrawal — leaving behind a weak central government that has proved incapable of halting insurgent advances around the country — but rather on the fact that the administra­tion was going to miss the May 1 deadline. “We are not agreeing with delay after May 1,” Zabihullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman, said on local television. “Any delay after May 1 is not acceptable for us.”

Biden administra­tion officials said that the United States would reposition U.S. troops in the region to keep an eye on Afghanista­n and on the Taliban, and would hold the Taliban to a commitment that there would not be a re-emergence of a terrorist threat on American or Western interests from Afghanista­n. But it was unclear what that meant or how far those reposition­ed forces would go to protect, for example, the fragile Afghan government or Afghan national security forces.

Biden administra­tion officials said that some troops would remain in the country to protect the American diplomatic presence in Afghanista­n, a standard practice.

It is unclear how the administra­tion will fulfill its pledge to prevent al- Qaida from establishi­ng a larger presence in the country — and possibly use it once again as a haven to launch attacks against the United States — if the Taliban do not honor their promise to sever ties with the terrorist organizati­on.

 ??  ?? BIDEN
BIDEN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States