Think of victims before paroling violent felons

There has been much discussion in the state Legislature regarding parole, and now the Times Union has ventured forth with its opinion in an editorial. But in endorsing opportunities for inmates to regain their freedom, much is lost in the noise of high-mindedness.

Yes, some inmates avail themselves of services, programs and opportunities. It is also important to note, however, that not all crimes are equal; some are far more violent. All require different degrees of latitude in considering parole. Why, then, do these legislative and editorial pronouncements seem to ignore those important qualifiers?

What defines rehabilitation, especially in a confined and restrictive environment? How does the Parole Board quantify that goal? In the proposed parole reform legislation, I see no guidelines for board members. I see no mention of the impact on victims or their families, nor any attempt to allow them an opportunity to contribute to the discussion.

The assumption that all victims are retributive and want only vengeance is simply wrong. If an inmate expresses genuine remorse, has achieved levels of sobriety, education and counseling and proved themselves worthy, certainly that should be recognized by corrections employees and victims alike. However, the lack of direction, the lack of consideration for those most affected by the crime, and the absence of guidelines make these endorsements remiss at best, and dangerous at worst.

Recently a 65-year-old woman was accosted and seriously injured outside a Manhattan hotel.

The attacker, Brandon Elliott, 38, is on lifetime parole after murdering his own mother. This is just one example of a parolee who should not be out on the streets. The parolee who murdered my daughter while released for “good time” is another.

Parole boards are not infallible. Why would we give them more latitude with fewer guidelines? Why ignore the fears and lifelong pain suffered by families of victims?

Consider parole, with specific parameters, for low-level offenders who have proved themselves. But please, think not just twice, but many times, about the impact on victims and communities before violent offenders are given a pass. Judges and juries heard many days of evidence and committed to a sentence they believed to be just. Do not erase their efforts or the pain of those who have suffered at the hands of violent offenders.