Would new PGA Tour model have stopped defections?
PONTE VEDRA BEACH, Fla. — The PGA Tour is going to reward the biggest stars with as many as 11 tournaments that have small fields, big money and no cuts.
There is no denying it would not have happened without the threat and the disruption of Saudi-funded LIV Golf.
But it raises a question that might shed light on the differences between the rival circuits. If this had been in place two years ago, how many of the 36 PGA Tour players who defected to LIV Golf would have stayed?
“Zero to five,” Jordan Spieth said. “It’s still not guaranteed money, or that level of guaranteed money.”
That remains one of the differences in the two models.
The PGA Tour has put the prize fund at $20 million for its big events, just like LIV Golf, except with larger fields and more fresh faces. LIV is locked in with the same 48 players and the occasional alternate. But without a cut, the money effectively is guaranteed on both circuits.
Not to be overlooked, however, is that LIV players like Phil Mickelson, Dustin Johnson, Brooks Koepka, Cameron Smith and Bryson Dechambeau — all of whom have won majors in the last five years — received a signing bonus of what has been reported to be in the $150 million neighborhood.
“The easy way out,” is how Rory Mcilroy described players leaving for LIV when their prime years were still ahead of them.
The new PGA Tour model effectively creates two tours, but players — no matter their world ranking or what they have done lately — still must perform.
The top players are guaranteed spots on LIV for multiple years regardless of how they play. That aspect — more than the lack of a 36-hole cut or 54-hole events — is what led to suggestions the Saudifunded league would be merely an exhibition.
PGA Tour Commissioner Jay Monahan and his predecessor, Tim Finchem, have taken ideas from Greg Norman, the latter having created the World Golf Championships that were similar — but not identical — to the Shark’s failed plan of a World Golf Tour in the mid-1990s.
The PGA Tour stole a page from LIV’S playbook by not having a cut, effectively assuring sponsors and television that all the best players will play four rounds in the eight designated events, along with the three Fedex Cup playoff events.
It effectively creates a two-tier system. Then again, it has been that way for the 25 years the WGCS have been around. Those will be gone after this year.
The biggest criticism for the PGA Tour is doing away with a cut, regardless of its history of having no-cut events. Five years ago, the PGA Tour schedule had nine no-cut events, though not everyone felt compelled to play them (three were in Asia in the fall).
Tiger Woods, who has 26 no-cut victories among his 82 wins on the PGA Tour, was said to be among those who felt strongly about a cut, perhaps because he rarely worried about weekends off. Woods failed to make the cut seven times in his first 13 years on tour.
What the tour got right, however, was providing enough of an avenue for those who are not at the elite level or are trying to earn their way back. Ten spots will be awarded to leading players from the current Fedex Cup standings, some of that from points accrued in the fall. Five other spots would come from points earned at tournaments that year.
“As long as you’ve got a tee time, good golf takes care of everything,” J.T. Poston said in January as the system was being developed.
Performance still matters.
Jon Rahm, Si Woo Kim and Nico Echavarria already have won this year. About the only thing they have in common is that all start from scratch when they get to Kapalua in January.
It’s hard to argue with how these designated events are working with the star power that keeps showing up at the end. Scottie Scheffler won in Phoenix. Rahm won at Riviera. Bay Hill was the latest example on multiple levels.