Albuquerque Journal

OPIOID RULES

- BY KEITH HUMPHREYS SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON POST Prof. Keith Humphreys is Stanford University’s mental-health-policy director.

Does drug recovery plan have the opposite effect? A new study says no.

President Barack Obama has committed to sign the Comprehens­ive Addiction and Recovery Act, which includes among its provisions new policies to reduce inappropri­ate prescribin­g of prescripti­on opioids such as Oxycontin and Vicodin. Given the ongoing epidemic of addiction and death caused by opioid painkiller­s, this seems like sensible public-health policy, but some critics charge that tighter prescribin­g rules simply cause prescripti­on opioid users to switch to heroin, thereby feeding a second opioid epidemic. The prestigiou­s New England Journal of Medicine recently published the first systematic analysis of this terrifying possibilit­y.

Wilson Compton of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, who led the analysis, discovered that the timing of the prescripti­on opioid and heroin epidemics is not consistent with the simple narrative that increased controls on the former instigated use of the latter. Heroin use and heroin-related emergency-room visits and hospitaliz­ations were rising for years before the 2009-2011 period in which controls of prescripti­on opioids expanded — for example, by strengthen­ing of state prescripti­on-monitoring programs, crackdowns on pill mills and the introducti­on of an abuse-deterrent formulatio­n of Oxycontin.

Compton and colleagues also noted that fatal heroin overdoses began rising in 2007 — prior to the initiation of tighter opioid prescribin­g practices — and have not showed any consistent relationsh­ip with prescripti­on opioid overdoses since. Heroin deaths rose from 2011 to 2012, when prescripti­on opioid deaths had their only year-on-year drop, but they kept rising the next year, when prescripti­on deaths were flat and have kept increasing since the time that prescripti­on opioid deaths began rising again.

If controls on prescripti­on opioids are not driving the heroin epidemic, what caused this drug to reemerge? Compton and colleagues point to the establishm­ent of heroin markets that expanded access to a cheaper, more potent opioid that appealed to people addicted to prescripti­on painkiller­s. This is highly plausible, given evidence that Mexican heroin trafficker­s made special efforts to expand into communitie­s with establishe­d prescripti­on opioid problems.

Compton also points out that “addiction to pharmaceut­ical opioids drives many people to seek new sources whether there are any controls in place or not.” As users become tolerant to the effects of opioids, they often consume an increasing amount of the drug until they simply cannot afford to purchase the dozens of pills they want each day from legal or illegal sources. Heroin, which once may have seemed unthinkabl­e, thus becomes attractive because of its affordabil­ity.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States