Albuquerque Journal

Federal transgende­r rules blocked, for now

- BY PAUL J. WEBER ASSOCIATED PRESS

AUSTIN, Texas — A federal judge in Texas has blocked the Obama administra­tion’s order requiring public schools to let transgende­r students use the bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their chosen gender identity.

In a temporary injunction signed Sunday, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor ruled that the federal education law known as Title IX “is not ambiguous” about sex being defined as “the biological and anatomical difference­s between male and female students as determined at their birth.”

The judge said the order would apply nationwide. The ruling, he said, was not about the policy issues of transgende­r rights but about his conclusion that federal officials simply did not follow rules that require an opportunit­y for comment before such directives are issued.

“This case presents the difficult issue of balancing the protection of students’ rights

and that of personal privacy … while ensuring that no student is unnecessar­ily marginaliz­ed while attending school,” he wrote.

The ruling was the second recent setback for transgende­r advocates. Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Virginia school board can block for now a transgende­r male from using the boys’ restroom while justices decide whether to fully intervene.

Texas and 12 other states challenged the White House directive as unconstitu­tional.

The judge also sided with Republican state leaders who argued that schools should have been allowed to weigh in before the White House mandate was announced in May.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, had argued that blocking the Obama order before school began was necessary because districts risked losing federal education dollars if they did not comply. Federal officials did not explicitly make that threat upon issuing the directive, although they never ruled out the possibilit­y.

“This president is attempting to rewrite the laws enacted by the elected representa­tives of the people and is threatenin­g to take away federal funding from schools to force them to conform,” Paxton said. “That cannot be allowed to continue, which is why we took action to protect states and school districts.”

The Justice Department issued a brief statement saying it was disappoint­ed in the ruling and was reviewing its options. If the Obama administra­tion challenges the injunction, the case would head next to the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The ruling does not prohibit schools that allow transgende­r students to use the facilities of their choice from continuing to do so.

Paul Castillo is a Dallas attorney for the gay rights group Lambda Legal, which had urged the court to let the White House directive stand. He said the latest ruling was a continuati­on of attacks on transgende­r people.

“I think today is going to be a hard day for transgende­r students,” Castillo said. “The decision is certainly emotional and certainly an attack on transgende­r students’ dignity.”

The federal government issued the mandate days after the Justice Department sued North Carolina over a state law that requires people to use public bathrooms that correspond with the sex on their birth certificat­es. U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch likened that law to the policies of racial segregatio­n. Republican­s have argued such laws are commonsens­e privacy safeguards.

The lawsuit was filed in May by Texas, Alabama, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Utah and Georgia, and the Republican governors of Maine, Mississipp­i and Kentucky.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States