Albuquerque Journal

Republican­s’ path to repealing health care law

Millions may be left without insurance

- BY ALAN FRAM ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — The stakes confrontin­g Republican­s determined to dismantle President Barack Obama’s health care law were evident in one recent encounter between an Ohio congressma­n and a constituen­t.

“He said, ‘Now you guys own it. Now fix it. It’s on your watch now,’” recalled GOP Rep. Pat Tiberi, chairman of a pivotal health subcommitt­ee. “And this is a supporter.”

Republican­s have unanimousl­y opposed Obama’s law since Democrats muscled it through Congress in 2010. They’ve tried derailing it scores of times but have failed, stymied by internal divisions and Obama’s veto power.

With the Republican­s controllin­g Congress and Donald Trump entering the White House on Jan. 20, their mantra of repeal and replace is now a toptier goal that the party’s voters fully expect them to achieve — starting this week.

But by unwinding the statute, the GOP would kill or recast programs that provide coverage to 20 million Americans who will be wary of anyone threatenin­g their health insurance. That and continuing Republican rifts over how to reshape the law, pay for the replacemen­t and avoid destabiliz­ing health insurance markets mean party leaders have a bumpy path ahead. Q: What’s first? A: When the new Congress convenes Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has said his chamber will begin debating a bare bones budget for next year. Most significan­tly, that would trigger a special procedure letting Republican­s repeal much of Obama’s law by a simple Senate majority.

That’s big because GOP senators will only have a 52-48 edge. The debate will also be a way for Republican­s to signal quickly to voters that they’re starting to erase the law. Q: And then? A: Lawmakers will work on legislatio­n actually repealing much of Obama’s law.

The legislatio­n is likely to erase the mandate that people buy insurance or face hefty IRS fines, which Republican­s despise. Also facing eliminatio­n or reductions: taxes Obama imposed on upper-income people to finance the law, subsidies that help millions afford health care and the expansion of Medicaid health coverage to more lowerearni­ng people. Federal aid to Planned Parenthood would be halted, reflecting GOP opposition to the right to abortion, one of the women’s health services provided by the organizati­on.

They hope to pass the bill by late spring, but its provisions probably won’t take effect for up to four years to give lawmakers time to craft a replacemen­t.

This won’t be easy. Many congressio­nal Republican­s are from states like Arizona, Nevada and Pennsylvan­ia that have added about 10 million people to Medicaid and will oppose abandoning so many voters. Others will be nervous about voting to repeal the overall law without having replacemen­t legislatio­n to show constituen­ts.

Republican­s also worry that during the transition to a new system, health insurers — already struggling in some states — might protect themselves by leaving some markets and boosting premiums. To ease that, GOP aides say they’re considerin­g including some kind of stabilizat­ion fund in the repeal bill to protect insurers against losses. That remains a work in progress.

Q: Will the 20 million people now covered lose their benefits?

A: Some probably will, a byproduct of reducing Medicaid coverage and dropping the requiremen­t that individual­s buy insurance.

That could be partly offset by some who’d purchase less expensive policies because the bill will probably let insurers drop coverage for some of the 10 services they now must provide, such as outpatient care and pregnancie­s.

At a briefing for reporters, top House GOP aides said the goal is “universal access” to health benefits, as opposed to aiming for coverage of all Americans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States