White House denies mass deportation plans
Memo proposed use of National Guard
The White House distanced itself Friday from a Department of Homeland Security draft proposal to use the National Guard to round up unauthorized immigrants, but lawmakers said the document offers insight into the Trump administration’s internal efforts to enact its promised crackdown on illegal immigration.
Administration officials said the proposal, which called for mobilizing up to 100,000 troops in 11 states, was rejected, and would not be part of plans to carry out President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration policy.
But if implemented, the National Guard idea, contained in an 11-page memo obtained by The Associated Press, could have led to enforcement action against millions of immigrants living nowhere near the Mexican border. Four states that border on Mexico were included in the proposal — California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas — but it also encompassed seven states contiguous to those four — Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Despite the AP’s public release of the document, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said there was “no effort at all to utilize the National Guard to round up unauthorized immigrants.” A DHS official described the document as a very early draft that was not seriously considered and never brought to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly for approval.
Joe Vigil, the New Mexico National Guard’s deputy chief of affairs, told the Journal Friday that the New Mexico Guard has not received any orders from Washington related to the ongoing deportation efforts.
The news of a possible National Guard mobilization prompted New Mexico’s Democratic U.S. senators to request a meeting with ICE’s Acting Director Thomas Homan late Friday.
“We are already hearing from our constituents that ICE is expanding enforcement activities and innocent people no longer feel safe in their own neighborhoods,” the senators wrote to Homan.
Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham, D-N.M., and other members of Congress met with Homan Thursday, and a spokesman for the congresswoman told the Journal Friday that the subject of the National Guard did not come up in that meeting.
At the Legislature in Santa Fe, Rep. Bill McCamley, D-Mesilla Park, quickly introduced HB 560 in an effort to prevent the New Mexico National Guard from involvement in federal immigration operations.
The AP had sought comment from the White House beginning Thursday and DHS earlier Friday and had not received a response from either. After the AP released the story, Spicer said the memo was “not a White House document” and said there was “no effort to do what is potentially suggested.”
However, DHS staffers said Thursday that they had been told by colleagues in two DHS departments that the proposal was still being considered as recently as Feb. 10. DHS spokeswoman Gillian Christensen declined to say who wrote the memo, how long it had been under consideration or when it had been rejected.
The pushback from administration officials did little to quell outrage over the draft plan. Two Republican governors spoke out against the proposal and numerous Democratic lawmakers denounced it as an overly aggressive approach to immigration enforcement.
“Regardless of the White House’s response, this document is an absolutely accurate description of the disturbing mindset that pervades the Trump administration when it comes to our nation’s immigrants,” said U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.)
Arkansas Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he would have “concerns about the utilization of National Guard resources for immigration enforcement,” believing such a program “would be too much of a strain on our National Guard personnel.”