Albuquerque Journal

Millions targeted for possible deportatio­n under Trump rules

New rules overhaul enforcemen­t practices across state, nation

- BY LAUREN VILLAGRAN JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

Sweeping new immigratio­n policies issued by the Trump administra­tion expand the government’s ability to detain and deport millions of undocument­ed immigrants, which portends a sea change in enforcemen­t, especially in border states such as New Mexico.

In two memos dated Feb. 20 and posted to the Department of Homeland Security website, Secretary John Kelly said the government will target any unauthoriz­ed immigrant suspected of, charged with or convicted of a criminal offense — and not limit enforcemen­t to violent criminals and unlawful border crossers, as has been the case in recent years.

“Criminal aliens have demonstrat­ed their disregard for the rule of law and pose a threat to persons residing in the United States,” Kelly said in the memo. Crossing the border illegally itself is a federal crime. Overstayin­g a visa is a civil offense.

The memo also prioritize­s those who have misreprese­nted themselves to a government agency, abused public benefits programs or are judged by immigratio­n authoritie­s to pose a risk to public safety or national security.

“It could put millions of undocument­ed people here at risk,” said Maureen Meyer, senior associate for migrant rights at the Washington Office on Latin America, a think tank that advocates for immigrant rights. “It will likely separate families, particular­ly families of mixed immigratio­n status. Anybody here without the right papers could be fair game.”

A spokesman for Gov. Susana Martinez, a Republican, said the governor “has always said we need to strengthen our border, and that includes enforcing federal law.”

Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., slammed the new guidelines, saying they “amount to a plan to begin mass deportatio­ns” and are “unrealisti­c, inhumane, bad for the economy and an extremely inefficien­t use of already thin resources.”

‘Dreamers’ exempt

Exempted from the new enforcemen­t priorities are those young immigrants known as “dreamers” who were protected by an executive order by then-President Barack Obama known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.

More than 10,500 New Mexicans are protected under the program, and nearly 750,000 immigrants are covered by DACA nationwide.

President Donald Trump vowed to make tougher immigratio­n enforcemen­t a keystone of his administra­tion. Kelly’s two memos serve as practical guidelines to the president’s recent executive orders on border security and immigratio­n.

DHS officials, speaking anonymousl­y in a call with reporters, sought to calm fears on Tuesday.

“We do not need a sense of panic in the communitie­s,” an official told The Washington Post. “We do not have the personnel, time or resources to go into communitie­s and round up people and do all kinds of mass throwing folks on buses. This is not intended to produce mass roundups, mass deportatio­ns.”

But Vicki Gaubeca, executive director of the ACLU’s Regional Center for Border Rights in Las Cruces, said, “I’m not sure how they can say that and allay the concerns of the public. Because the potential for that is there (in the new guidance). What kind of protection­s are they putting in place, instead of just words? If they want to allay fears, they should be very clear what those protection­s are.”

Local cooperatio­n

In a provision that is likely to generate significan­t debate from Santa Fe to Las Cruces, Kelly directed federal agencies to partner with local law enforcemen­t to authorize “qualified officers … to perform the functions of an immigratio­n officer.”

Counties statewide have for several years strictly limited local law enforcemen­t’s ability to work with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s, in part because of legal liabilitie­s associated with doing so as well as to encourage undocument­ed residents to report crimes.

Police, sheriff’s deputies and jails in New Mexico often cooperate with U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t concerning individual­s who are felons or are charged with violent or serious crimes, including drug traffickin­g. But most local agencies restrict their officers from inquiring about immigratio­n status during routine stops.

Another provision in the memos authorizes the use of “expedited removal” nationwide — a practice previously restricted to a zone within 100 miles of the border, which doesn’t include Albuquerqu­e.

Under expedited removal, immigratio­n officers may remove “without further hearing or review” any immigrant who they determine to be “inadmissab­le” under U.S. law.

U.S. Border Patrol apprehende­d more than 408,000 unlawful immigrants near the Southwest border in fiscal 2016, up 23 percent from the prior year but well below the million-plus apprehensi­ons of a decade ago.

Illegal immigratio­n, especially from Mexico, has plummeted over the past 10 years.

More often, migrants are arriving at the Southwest border from Central America, Brazil and other countries. Many of them are fleeing extreme violence and poverty and have made claims of “credible fear,” a precursor to applying for asylum.

The memos keep policies in place to interview recent arrivals for “credible fear” but also tighten guidance on who can be released into the country while awaiting a court hearing. Most immigrants will be detained, according to the memos.

Increased detention

The memos state that “lawful detention of aliens … is the most efficient means by which to enforce the immigratio­n laws at our borders.”

“Policies that facilitate the release of removable aliens apprehende­d at and between the ports of entry, which allow them to abscond and fail to appear at their removal hearings, undermine the border security mission,” the memo says. “Such policies, collective­ly referred to as ‘catch-and-release,’ shall end.”

New Mexico has at least three detention facilities specifical­ly designated to hold undocument­ed immigrants, one each in Torrance, Cibola and Otero counties. Together the facilities include at least 2,000 beds.

Additional­ly, the U.S. Marshals contract on behalf of other federal agencies for detention space in Hidalgo, Luna and Doña Ana county jails on the border; many detainees there are recent border crossers who are charged with felony illegal entry or re-entry and are awaiting sentencing at federal court in Las Cruces.

“The message has been made clear that the new policies are detention-centric,” said Olsi Vrapi, an Albuquerqu­e immigratio­n attorney. “We are seeing in practice already that our clients who would have gotten bond three weeks ago are now being denied bond.”

The memo hinges the expanded detention authority on the government’s establishi­ng new detention centers and a plan with the Department of Justice to “surge the deployment of immigratio­n judges and asylum officers.”

The nation’s immigratio­n courts are overwhelme­d with a backlog of more than 534,000 pending cases, according to the memo.

Supporting the effort

“I think that the restoratio­n of serious no-nonsense immigratio­n enforcemen­t is the only thing that is going to make it possible for immigratio­n reform in the future,” said Jessica Vaughan, director for policy studies at the Center for Immigratio­n Studies, a think tank that advocates stricter immigratio­n enforcemen­t. “The main reason that amnesty proposals failed in the past is because people didn’t have any faith that the laws were going to be enforced.”

Deportatio­ns by ICE reached a peak during the Obama administra­tion, with nearly 410,000 in fiscal 2008.

Nearly 3 million unauthoriz­ed immigrants were removed by ICE during the Obama years, although the pace slowed considerab­ly during the last two years of his administra­tion.

To facilitate increased enforcemen­t, Kelly’s memos authorize ICE to hire 10,000 new officers and Border Patrol to hire 5,000 new agents.

Kelly also echoes Trump’s executive order by calling for the immediate “planning, design, constructi­on and maintenanc­e of a wall” at the southern border.

The memos do not specify how much implementi­ng the new policies will cost or how DHS intends to pay for its expanded enforcemen­t plans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States