Albuquerque Journal

When to ea t ?

- BY AMBY BURFOOT THE WASHINGTON POST

For the first time in its 93-year history, the American Heart Associatio­n has released a “scientific statement” on meal timing and frequency, and how they can affect weight and cardiovasc­ular disease. The advisory committee behind the statement — a mix of physicians and nutrition researcher­s — note several reasons for the review’s importance now. These include rising rates of obesity, heart disease and diabetes, as well as increased profession­al and popular interest in meal-timing topics.

For example, is breakfast good or bad for health and weight control? Does fasting reduce body weight? Can it improve glucose control? What about calories consumed after dinner?

“Americans have an around-the-clock lifestyle, so food consumptio­n also occurs at nearly all hours,” says Marie-Pierre St-Onge, associate professor of nutritiona­l medicine at the Columbia University Medical Center and chair of the AHA committee. “Animal studies have shown that this can have adverse effects on health. Now is the time for studies on optimal food consumptio­n times for humans.”

In general, the 27-page AHA statement concludes that breakfast remains an essential daily meal for optimal wellbeing. The advisory group also says it thinks that intermitte­nt fasting holds promise for weight loss. Intentiona­l planning of meals and snacks can maximize the benefits of healthy food consumptio­n while minimizing pitfalls such as excessive snacking and late-night consumptio­n.

Meal timing makes a difference, the advisory committee notes, because the body has a system of internal “clocks” that regulate all aspects of metabolism.

Many of these clocks are more affected by food consumptio­n than by daylight and nighttime. For example, experiment­s have shown that mice gain more weight and develop more diseases when fed around the clock than when fed only in a “window” of nine to 12 hours.

This occurs even though total calorie consumptio­n remains the same in both conditions.

On key aspects of meal timing and frequency, the committee made the follow-

ing observatio­ns:

Breakfast

Twenty to 30 percent of Americans don’t eat a traditiona­l breakfast. This proportion is still increasing, and it parallels the rise in obesity rates. In one study of 20to 39-year-olds, those who regularly consumed a breakfast cereal were 31 percent less likely to be overweight or obese. Also, three large-group studies have shown significan­tly lower diabetes rates among breakfast eaters. “We have strong population evidence of an associatio­n between breakfast consumptio­n and health,” says St-Onge.

Intermitte­nt fasting

Interest in this popular weight-loss approach has mushroomed so much that it’s challengin­g to track all the new diets. The phenomenon has grown too fast for science to keep up. Still, some early results are promising. If a fasting plan reduces overall calorie consumptio­n, subjects should lose weight and reduce glucose concerns. Every-otherday fasting produces better results than 5:2 fasting. A big caveat: Nothing is known about long-term success and health outcomes linked to intermitte­nt fasting. “Anyone interested in fasting should make sure they are following an evidenceba­sed approach,” says Penny Kris-Etherton, distinguis­hed professor of nutrition at Pennsylvan­ia State University.

Meal frequency

The idea of “grazing” one’s way through the day has long had advocates who claim the practice can increase energy and decrease hunger. However, the AHA council found little support for the strategy, at least in research documentin­g weight loss and health enhancemen­t. There have been a number of small studies with impressive­ly bizarre designs — 17 mini-meals a day — but not enough to reach a strong conclusion. The committee notes that day-long eating “may not be useful for decreasing body weight or improving cardiometa­bolic risk factors.” Kris-Etherton adds: “This approach can make it too easy for people to over-consume total daily calories.”

Nighttime eating

Several large-group studies have shown increased obesity, metabolic syndrome and chronic inflammati­on among those consuming calories late in the day vs. earlier. Men who fall asleep at night and then wake up for a snack face particular risks — a 55 percent increase in heart disease. In one study, on the other hand, subjects maintained the same total daily calories, but moved 300 calories a day from dinner to breakfast and managed to lose more than 45 pounds in 36 weeks. To do this, they ate chocolate and ice cream for breakfast. However, the results of this study are complicate­d by the low-carbohydra­te, high-protein diet used.

 ??  ??
 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Students are given healthy choices on a lunch line at Draper Middle School in Rotterdam, N.Y.
ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO Students are given healthy choices on a lunch line at Draper Middle School in Rotterdam, N.Y.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States