Albuquerque Journal

Use free-market fix for overbookin­g

- Columnist Samuelson’s columns, including those not published in the Journal, can be read at abqjournal.com/opinion — look for the syndicated columnist link. Copyright, The Washington Post Writers Group.

WASHINGTON — There are lots of public policy problems that, even with the best of political goodwill, cannot be easily solved. They’re just inherently tough. Fixing airline overbookin­g is not one of them.

As proposed by Harvard economist Greg Mankiw on his blog, the solution is straightfo­rward: Make the airlines pay when they overbook. When they do, “They should fully bear the consequenc­es. They should be required — by government regulation — to keep raising the offered compensati­on until they get volunteers to give up their seats,” writes Mankiw. “If $800 does not work, then try $1,600 or $8,000.”

Mankiw adds, somewhat gratuitous­ly, that he’s “sure volunteers will appear as the price rises.”

The fundamenta­l problem is that the airlines have sold — or committed — more seats than they have. The object is to buy back those nonexisten­t seats. Consider a simple example. Suppose that the airline has 100 seats and has sold 104 tickets. Under Mankiw’s proposal, the airline would have to offer passengers enough money so that four of them would decide to take the money or some combinatio­n of a free ticket and cash. Let’s assume that two passengers require $1,000 plus a free ticket, a third accepts a $1,200 buyout and the last sets a price of $1,500.

I would tweak Mankiw’s proposal by requiring that all the bumped passengers receive the highest payment. In this case, it’s $1,500. On this issue, it’s not clear where Mankiw stands. So the airline’s total cost would be $6,000, plus the cost of vouchers for new tickets. I would also put an upper limit for each passenger, calculated as some multiple of a full ticket price, but it would be high.

This system would modify existing government regulation­s that the Wall Street Journal’s travel columnist Scott McCartney characteri­zes as giving fliers “few rights.” If asked to deplane, they must comply for safety reasons. Under certain circumstan­ces, bumped passengers are entitled to vouchers and the cost of a hotel. Under my proposal, and presumably Mankiw’s, the safety mandate would remain, but it would not extend to passengers bumped due to overbookin­g.

What we have here is a good example of how government regulation­s on bumping — adopted by the Department of Transporta­tion — would further a free-market solution, creating an auction system to balance the number of passengers with the number of seats. Making airlines pay more for overbookin­g would, almost certainly, make them more careful in their scheduling, while also more adequately compensati­ng inconvenie­nced passengers.

 ??  ?? ROBERT J. SAMUELSON
ROBERT J. SAMUELSON

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States