Albuquerque Journal

Trust company didn’t post bond, avoided oversight

Officials scrambling in hopes of recovering money for disabled clients

- BY COLLEEN HEILD JOURNAL INVESTIGAT­IVE REPORTER

First of two parts

Desert State Life Management is a decadesold nonprofit company with a mission to provide asset management, trust services and life planning for individual­s who are “decisional­ly incapacita­ted and require protective oversight.”

Now that state and federal authoritie­s allege that millions of dollars in client assets were siphoned off into private businesses and personal accounts of Desert State’s CEO, Paul Donisthorp­e, families with loved ones whose trust accounts have been decimated are asking where were the protection­s and can they recoup their money?

As for the financial protection­s, officials say they can find no evidence Desert State ever posted a surety bond or in the alternativ­e provided other evidence of financial responsibi­lity as required by state law. And, the company was last audited by the state in 2008.

As for recovering the money for the estimated 70 affected clients, state officials aren’t offering much hope.

The state, however, is looking at possible insurance coverage and is seeking to place Desert State into court-ordered receiversh­ip. The FBI, meanwhile, has filed a federal civil action

to seize two properties owned by Donisthorp­e and his wife.

Donisthorp­e has reportedly suffered brain damage from a stroke, fall or suicide attempt that occurred within days of the state’s beginning its examinatio­n of Desert State’s books. Neither he nor his wife, criminal defense lawyer Liane Kerr, has responded to Journal requests for comment.

No bond posted

Mike Unthank, the state superinten­dent of Regulation and Licensing, told the Journal last week that his agency is planning to introduce legislatio­n in the 30-day session to strengthen the legal requiremen­ts for New Mexico’s nonprofit certified trust companies, of which there is currently just one: Desert State.

“I think it certainly begs the question of how do we go about ensuring to the public that their funds are safe and sound in these different institutio­ns that claim to be nonprofit,” Unthank said.

New Mexico law requires state certified trust companies, both for-profit and nonprofit, to file a surety bond or otherwise prove financial responsibi­lity in case anyone is damaged by a company’s negligence, fraud, embezzleme­nt or breach of trust.

But Regulation and Licensing officials told the Journal it appears no surety bond was posted when the company obtained its initial certificat­e to operate as a trust company in the early 1990s — or when Donisthorp­e took over in 2006.

And the alternativ­e proof of financial responsibi­lity?

There’s no way to tell from state Financial Institutio­n Division files what informatio­n was ever provided to regulators to ensure the company’s clients were protected, Unthank said.

“It’s my understand­ing that the (state Financial Institutio­ns Division) director at the time felt they were financiall­y sound to operate the not-for-profit trust company,” said Unthank, who has overseen the state Financial Institutio­ns Division as head of RLD since 2014.

The irregulari­ties at Desert State surfaced after Chris Moya, acting director of the FID, ordered a long-overdue financial examinatio­n of the company’s books at the end of last year. For several years, Desert State had made excuses as to why it couldn’t submit to such an examinatio­n, but Moya insisted, according to court records.

Under state law, the division has the authority to perform such an examinatio­n annually, but isn’t required to do so.

Unthank said FID in recent years has “been very, very diligent about increasing the number of exams” but there are only 17 full-time examiners to do financial examinatio­ns of 11,000 entities that are registered with or fall under the Financial Institutio­ns purview.

He told the Journal that one lesson learned from the Desert State case is “to make sure we have the opportunit­y to examine these folks on a regular basis.”

CEO’s political ties

In the mid-1990s, Desert State reported on tax forms revenue of up to $3 million, primarily from contracts with the state Attorney General’s Office and the New Mexico Department of Human Services.

Desert State back then primarily provided guardiansh­ip and conservato­r services for the developmen­tally disabled or others who were incapacita­ted in some way.

The nonprofit company specialize­d in special needs trusts, which are designed for beneficiar­ies with disabiliti­es, either physical or mental. The trusts are written to allow the beneficiar­y to receive essential government benefits while maintainin­g eligibilit­y for distributi­ons from trust accounts — which can come from lawsuit settlement­s or other money set aside by the clients’ families.

“In the early days, it was the most wonderful thing because they (Desert State) really filled the need that other people wouldn’t do,” said Albuquerqu­e attorney Susan Tomita. “This is so sad about what’s happened.”

The state contracts had dried up by the time Donisthorp­e, a CPA, took over, and he essentiall­y downsized the operation, tax records show.

News stories describe him as an investment banker, and he has served as a former deputy state fair manager and as a municipal adviser for Bernalillo

County.

Donisthorp­e comes from a politicall­y prominent Republican New Mexico family.

His brother Bruce, who died in 2016, was a Republican consultant and pollster. His mother, Christine Donisthorp­e, represente­d San Juan County as a Republican in the state Senate from 1979 to 1996.

Donisthorp­e ran for state Treasurer as a Republican in 1986 but lost in the general election to Democrat James Lewis.

Before becoming CEO of Desert State, Donisthorp­e prepared the nonprofit trust company’s tax returns.

Donisthorp­e has operated Desert State from an office on North Fourth Street where his wife has a law office.

Desert State at one time had three board members, including Donisthorp­e. Former Democratic state Sen. Tom Rutherford served on the board until 2016, the state’s petition states.

The other board member besides Donisthorp­e is Helen Bennett, who has helped state examiners with their investigat­ion, according to the receiversh­ip petition filed by the state.

Insurance mystery

On its 990 tax form filed in March 2015, the most recent available to the public, Desert State reported receiving more than $200,000 in fiduciary fees. Donisthorp­e paid himself $12,000 as CEO.

He also reported expenses that included about $20,000 for two insurance policies: general liability and a second policy for directors and officers of the company.

Unthank said that when state financial examiners began to probe into the company’s books, they discovered that the premium payment on one of the insurance policies was “either expiring or had expired.”

“We’re looking at those (insurance) issues right now to determine just exactly what, if anything, is there?” Unthank said last week. Such insurance policies typically provide coverage to directors and officers who are sued for making mistakes that harmed others, or for failing to fulfill their fiduciary responsibi­lity.

It’s unclear whether that coverage would extend to what the FID petition described as alleged theft.

Bennett, through her attorney A. Blair Dunn, recently met with the FBI. Dunn said Bennett decided to pay the premium for the directors’ and officers’ policy out of her own pocket.

She was named in a lawsuit filed June 6 by the nonprofit Ayudando Guardians Inc. on behalf of seven of its clients who had assets with Desert State. The lawsuit seeks damages and an accounting of their funds held by the trust management company.

In a response filed late Friday, Bennett stated that she was a volunteer member of the board with no access or control over Desert State’s corporate or trustee assets.

She also filed a motion for a temporary restrainin­g order to keep Donisthorp­e and his wife from transferri­ng, disposing or converting assets that potentiall­y derive from the alleged fraud, embezzleme­nt or conversion of funds.

Nonprofit loophole?

Unthank is critical of the section of state law that exempts nonprofit trust companies from having to provide capitaliza­tion to ensure there are adequate internal resources to operate the company.

Capitaliza­tion of up to $500,000 is required for trust companies that operate as “for profit,” of which there are seven currently certified by the state. Four banks also have trust department­s that are overseen by state regulators.

“It does open the door ... Just think from the standpoint, ‘hey, here’s a business I can get into pretty easy. I don’t have to put much capital in it and now I have control over a large number of people’s assets and it doesn’t require me to do very much,’ ” he said, referring to nonprofit trust companies.

Nonprofits may not have the capitaliza­tion required of bigger trust companies. But Unthank said there’s no way to reassure the client base “that I have the ability to actually manage that, because I don’t have to demonstrat­e any kind of bond or any type of responsibi­lity other than that vague language that’s whatever’s acceptable to the director at the time.”

Unthank stressed that he’s not advocating changes for the operation or certificat­ion of New Mexico’s for-profit trust companies.

“They have very substantia­l portfolios compared to this entity, which had a pretty small portfolio, albeit that every dollar of that is important to people who had their money in that trust company.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Paul Donisthorp­e
Paul Donisthorp­e
 ??  ?? Mike Unthank
Mike Unthank

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States